The Tragedy Of Bidenomics! Consumers Using Debt, Draining Saving To Cope With Inflation (Phantom Debt Soaring While Biden Makes Light Of The Disaster)

Biden, talking to CNN’s Erin Burnett, made light of America’s struggles with Bidenflation (higher home prices, higher mortgage rates, higher energy and food costs, higher …) caliously saying that “they can afford it.” Well Joe, your big donors (the top 0.5% can afford it! But not the middle class that you have abandoned. In fact, much of America has drained their savings and run up massive debt to cope with your terrible economic policies.

The amount of credit card debt across the US has hit a new record high of $1.337 trillion (even though it appears to have finally hit a brick wall, barely rising in April by the smallest amount since the covid crash), even as the savings rate has tumbled to an all time low.

To be sure, credit card debt is just a small portion (~6%) of the total household debt stack: as the next chart from the latest NY Fed consumer credit report shows, the bulk, or 70%, of US household debt is in the form of mortgages, followed by student loans, auto loans, credit card debt, home equity credit and various other forms. Altogether, the total is a massive $17.5 trillion in total household debt.

But staggering as the mountain of household debt may be, at least we know how huge the problem is; after all the data is public. What is far more dangerous – because we have no clue about its size – is what Bloomberg calls “Phantom Debt“, and have repeatedly called Buy Now, Pay Later debt. How much of that kind of debt is out there is largely a guess.

But while it is easy to ensnare young, incomeless Americans into the net of installment debt where they will rot as the next generation of debt slaves for the rest of their lives, there is an even more sinister side to this extremely popular form of debt which allows consumers to split purchases into smaller installments: as Bloomberg reports in a lengthy expose on installment debt, the major companies that provide these so called “pay in four” products, such as Affirm Holdings, Klarna Bank and Block’s Afterpay, don’t report those loans to credit agencies. That’s why Buy Now/Pay Later credit has earned a far more ominous nickname:

It’s hard enough for central bankers and Wall Street traders to make sense of the post-pandemic economy with the data available to them. At Wells Fargo & Co., senior economist Tim Quinlan is particularly spooked by the “phantom debt” that he can’t see.

Which is not to say that we have no idea how much “phantom debt” is out there: according to the report, it is projected to reach almost $700 billion globally by 2028, and yet, time and again, the companies that issue it have resisted calls for greater disclosure, even as the market has grown each year since at least 2020. That, as Bloomberg accurately warns, is masking a complete picture of the financial health of American households, which is crucial for everyone from global central banks to US regional lenders and multinational businesses.

In fact, the recent explosion in installment debt may explain why the US consumer remains so resilient even when most conventional economic metrics suggest consumers should be struggling: “Consumer spending in the world’s largest economy has been so resilient in the face of stubbornly high inflation that economists and traders have had to repeatedly rip up their forecasts for slowing growth and interest-rate cuts.”

Still, cracks are starting to form. First it was Americans falling behind on auto loans. Then credit-card delinquency rates reached the highest since at least 2012, with the share of debts 30, 60 and 90 days late all on the upswing.

And now, there are also signs that consumers are struggling to afford their BNPL debt, too. A recent survey conducted for Bloomberg News by Harris Poll found that 43% of those who owe money to BNPL services said they were behind on payments, while 28% said they were delinquent on other debt because of spending on the platforms.

For Quinlan, a major concern is that economic experts are being “lulled into complacency about where consumers are.”

“People need to be more awake to the risk of BNPL,” he said in an interview.

Well, those who care, are awake – we have written dozens of articles on the danger it poses; the problem is that those who are enabled by this latest mountain of debt – such as the Biden administration which can claim a victory for Bidenomics because the economy is so “strong”, phantom debt be damned – are actively motivated to ignore it.

So why is this latest debt bubble called a “phantom”?

Well, BNPL is a black box largely because of a longstanding blame game among BNPL providers and the three major credit bureaus: TransUnion, Experian and Equifax. The BNPL companies don’t provide data on their installment loans that are split into four payments, which were used by online shoppers to spend an estimated $19.2 billion in the first quarter, according to Adobe Analytics, up 12.3% compared with the same period last year.

The BNPL giants say credit agencies can’t handle their information — and that releasing it could harm customers’ credit scores, which are key to securing mortgages and other loans. The big three bureaus say they’re ready, while two of the major credit scoring firms, VantageScore Solutions and Fair Isaac Corp. (FICO), say they’re equipped to test how the products will affect their figures. Meanwhile, regulation is looming over the industry, but this stalemate has left the status quo mostly in place.

In other words, not only do we not know just how big the BNPL problem is, it is actively masked by credit agencies which can’t accurately calculate the FICO score of tens of millions of Americans, and as a result their credit capacity is artificially boosted with far more debt than they can handle… and that’s why the US consumer has been so “strong” in recent years, defying all conventional credit metrics.

The good news is that despite the tacit pushback of the administration, there has been some signs of progress. Apple earlier this year became the first major BNPL provider to furnish transaction and payment data to Experian. As of now, it provides a snapshot of consumers’ overall debt load from Apple Pay Later transactions, but the information won’t be used for consumer credit scores. In separate statements to Bloomberg, Klarna, Affirm and Block said they want assurance that consumers’ credit scores and their data would be protected before reporting customer information. Representatives for TransUnion, Experian and Equifax said they’ve updated their structures and the data would be secure.

Still, the lack of transparency has researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which publishes a comprehensive quarterly report on the $17.5 trillion in US household debt, convinced they’re missing some of what’s happening in the economy.

“They’ve reached a certain scale that they could impact economists’ assumptions about their economic outlooks,” said Simon Khalaf, Chief Executive Officer of Marqeta Inc., a firm that helps BNPL providers process their payments.

Meanwhile, the pernicious effects of BNPL credit are piling up: the Harris Poll survey conducted last month, provides some crucial clues about how Americans use BNPL. For one, splitting payments into smaller chunks encourages more spending, obviously.

More than half of respondents who use BNPL said it allowed them to purchase more than they could afford, while nearly a quarter agreed with the statement that their BNPL spending was “out of control.” Harris also found that 23% of users said they couldn’t afford the majority of what they bought without splitting payments, while more than a third turned to the services after maxing out credit cards.

The findings also show that the spending, which for more than a third of users has exceeded $1,000, isn’t entirely on big-ticket items. Almost half of those using BNPL say they’ve started, or have considered, using it to pay bills or buy essential items, including groceries.

Translation: Americans are no longer even charging everyday purchases they traditionally used cash and savings to pay for; now they are using installment plans to pay for bread!

It’s not just the lower classes that are abusing BNPL credit: while whatever small pockets of consumer distress have emerged so far in the US, have been chalked up to a bifurcated economy where working class Americans struggle to make ends meet, the survey found that middle-class households are relying on BNPL, too. The shocking punchline: about 42% of those with household income of more than $100,000 report being behind or delinquent on BNPL payments!

“BNPL essentially lets people dig a deeper and deeper hole of credit, which will be harder and harder to climb out of,” said Ed deHaan, a professor of accounting at Stanford Graduate School of Business, adding that it happens “more easily when there’s no transparency.”

Of course, installment debt is nothing new: the option to pay in installments using short-term loans has been around for a ong time, but it exploded in popularity during the pandemic, especially with younger, digitally savvy consumers who gravitated to the services as an alternative to credit cards. The pioneering BNPL companies, including Afterpay, Klarna and Affirm, launched with trendy retailers, partnered with social media influencers and became a common option on apps and online checkouts.

BNPL offers quick credit approvals and lets consumers pay in installments. The first is usually due right away, and the others are often collected once every two weeks for the popular “pay in four” loans. There’s typically no interest or fees, as long as payments are made on time. Like credit card companies, BNPL firms make money on fees from merchants — and some have steep penalties for missed payments.

While normally larger banks would avoid this kind of “new and much more dangerous subprime”, this time is different: the rapid adoption of the products has enticed major financial institutions to offer the option to split payments, even as regulators warn them of the risks. That includes PayPal, U.S. Bancorp and Citizens Financial. Even big banks like Citigroup and JPMorgan have similar capabilities on their credit cards.

The industry has branded itself a financial equalizer. They argue that “soft-credit checks” — when a lender runs a consumer’s credit history without affecting their score — expand credit access to those underserved by traditional lenders, while zero-interest provides a better deal than many cards.

Affirm said its customers have an average outstanding balance of $641, while Afterpay and Klarna put the figure at $250 and $150, respectively. Unfortunately, there is no way to check these numbers. And while the average credit card balance was $6,501 in the third quarter of 2023, according to Experian data, the BNPL balances mean that most Americans can’t even afford a weekly outing to their grocery store without putting it on an installment plan, a truly terrifying scenario.

Critics naturally argue that BNPL is particularly attractive to the financially vulnerable. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has flagged risks to consumers, including surprise late fees and “hidden interest” — or when BNPL purchases are made with credit cards charging high interest rates. The CFPB has also expressed concern about “loan stacking,” when individuals take out several BNPL loans at once with different providers, which is most of them.

Some BNPL services, including Afterpay and Klarna, require borrowers to agree to “mandatory autopayment,” meaning the companies can automatically charge the credit card or bank account on file when a payment is due. Those who link the latter are potentially vulnerable to overdraft fees.

Meanwhile, as rates remains sky high, even Wall Street’s perpetually cheerful analysts are wondering where is all the consumption coming from?

Robust consumer spending and low unemployment rates have many economists convinced the US consumer remains strong, making Wall Street bullish on the economy. But lately, stubbornly persistent inflation has dialed back expectations for imminent interest-rate relief.

That’s set to ramp up pressure on households that are already stretched thin by higher prices for everything from gas and food to rent and apparel. As of the end of December, almost 3.5% of credit-card balances were at least 30 days past due, according to the Philadelphia Fed, the most since the data began in 2012. Nominal card balances also set a new high.

For those who are falling behind, BNPL offers what appears to be a no-brainer decision: space out payments… at least until this last credit buffer fills up and bankruptcy is the only possible outcome.

That was the thinking of Hayden Waschak, a 23-year-old in Pittsburgh. Even though he said it felt “dystopian” to use  BNPL to pay for food, he began using Klarna in February to spread out payments on a grocery delivery app. It helped his finances — at first. After he lost his job as a documents processing specialist at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in March, he relied more heavily on the service. And without any income, he became delinquent on payments and started racking up late charges. He eventually paid off the nearly $200 balance, but he said his credit score dropped.

“Unexpected life events caused me to lose income,” Waschak said. “I ended up paying more than if I had paid for it all at once.”

Meanwhile, the fact that BNPL balances do not count against your credit rating, means users get little upside when it comes to their credit — paying on time won’t help them build up their score. On the other hand, the downside is still there for falling behind: not only can they get charged late fees, but delinquent BNPL loans can be turned over to debt collectors.

The latter is what Fabrizio Lopez said happened to him. He used Affirm to split up a $500 online payment for used-car parts in 2019. The Long Island-based mechanic, who doesn’t have a traditional credit card, said that while he received the items a week later, he never got a bill. That is, until debt collection letters started pouring in from across the US.

Lopez said he primarily relied on cash before that purchase, so the unpaid loan stands out on his credit profile. Now 30, he worries that a the BNPL purchase has created “invisible barriers” to the financial system.

“They hook you with the idea of no interest rates,” he said. “I thought that I would be able to build my credit if I paid it back — I was so wrong.”

He is not the only one who is “so wrong”: just as wrong are all those Panglossian economists at the Fed and Wall Street who believe that the US economy is growing at what the Atlanta Fed today laughably “calculated” was a 4.2% GDP, even as the DOE found that the most accurate indicator of overall economic strength, diesel demand, was the lowest since covid, an glaring paradox… yet glaring to all except those who refuse to see just how rotten the core of the US economy has become, and will be “absolutely shocked” when the next credit crisis destroys tens of millions of Americans drowning in what is now best known as “phantom debt.”

That’s Bidenomics! US Mortgage Purchase Demand (Applications) Rise 2% Over Past Week, But Remain DOWN -17% Since Last Year And DOWN -57% Under Biden

Biden and Bidenomics is disastrous for the middle class and low wage workers. Food and housing prices through the roof, and now we have mortgage purchase demand declining -57% under Biden.

Mortgage applications increased 2.6 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending May 3, 2024.

The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 2.6 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index increased 3 percent compared with the previous week.  The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 2 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index increased 2 percent compared with the previous week and was 17 percent lower than the same week one year ago.

In fact, Mortgage Purchase demand (applications) are down -57% under Biden and Bidenomics.

The Refinance Index increased 5 percent from the previous week and was 6 percent lower than the same week one year ago.

Bidenomics Strikes Again! First Office CRE Was Crashing, Now It Is Multifamily CRE (Return Of “Extend And Pretend”)

Lightning strikes TWICE!

One year after regional banks crashed and burned due to the combination of tumbling debt/treasury prices coupled with cratering commercial real estate loans, fears about the current state of Commercial Real Estate – where most offices still see tenants at best 3 to 4 days a week and are literally burning through rents – appear long forgotten. Is that sensible?

For one answer, we turned to the latest report from Goldman’s REIT/CRE expert Chandhi Luthra who has published a visual assessment of the state of CRE in 2024 in terms of loan maturities, 2023 extensions, and property and lender groups. She also looks at the latest transaction and leasing volumes, and shares several key takeaways.

  • There are ~$4.7tn of outstanding commercial/multifamily mortgages outstanding, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s 2023 Commercial Real Estate Survey of Loan Maturity Volumes.
  • More specifically in 2024, $929bn of CRE mortgages are expected to mature, ~20% of ~$4.7tn total commercial mortgages outstanding. In terms of property type, multifamily and office account for ~27% and ~22% of commercial mortgage maturities in 2024 respectively. In terms of lender type, banks hold ~47% of debt maturing in 2024, followed by CMBS at ~25%.

It is worth noting that 2024 commercial mortgage maturities are pushed up by 2023 extensions. As shown in Exhibit 3, among the CRE loans scheduled to mature in 2023, ~$610bn were refinanced, with ~$300bn pushed into 2024 and the remainder into future years. As a result, the total CRE refinancing volume is expected to be ~$929bn in 2024.

Of course, it does not end there, and since there has been no fundamental improvement, it is certain that extension volumes in 2024 will be high as well. However, as interest rates are expected to come down, demand for refinancing in 2024 may outpace that in 2023 according to the Goldman analyst (rates are still far, far higher than where they were when most of the loans were originated several years ago). At the same time, for loans that have already been extended in the past, it is also likely that future extensions could be harder.

Among the loans backed by office properties overall, ~25% is expected to come due in 2024. In terms of lender type, banks (primarily small, regional banks) hold ~38% of total CRE loan outstanding across all years, followed by the GSEs at 20%.

Looking at different debt metrics, DSCR for commercial real estate (office, industrial and retail combined) tracked at 1.52 in Dec, below the historical average of 1.69; debt yields for commercial real estate have been trending well above the historical average of ~11% in recent quarters, while apartments have held relatively well.

Office CMBS DQs have risen significantly, with Jan tracking at 6.3%, up significantly from 1.58% in Dec 2022. And while everyone knows the Office canary in the coalmine is dead and buried, keep an eye on Multifamily CMBS DQs which tracked at 1.91% vs 2.62% in December, with the sequential decline associated with a large San Francisco apartment loan that was recently disposed. The overall DQ rate tracked at 4.66% in January.

The Goldman strategist concludes with a word about CRE transaction and leasing: U.S. CRE transaction market continues to be muted, primarily driven by elevated interest rates, limited sources of capital, and the pricing gap between buyers and sellers. January volume was down -11% yoy, driven by easier compares in Jan 2023 (down -55%). In terms of leasing, Jan preliminary trends indicate weakness in activities, with office down -25% yoy and industrial down -28% yoy.

Here, Goldman trader Sara Cha chimes in (her report is also available to pro subs) and notes that we can see from the transaction data  “why sentiment in CRE brokers is a bit more mixed of late – thought yesterday’s JLL print had mixed reception – while you’ve seen some signs of life in capital markets space broadly to start the year, not seeing that as much on the CRE front (remember those 3Q-4Q greenshoots?).

Multifamily CRE

The commercial real estate sector continues to experience elevated stress . The latest crack to emerge is the increasing number of delinquencies on multifamily mortgages. 

In April, about 8.6% of commercial real estate loans bundled into collateralized loan obligations were distressed, reaching the record high set in January, according to Bloomberg, citing new data from analytics firm CRED iQ. 

The loans bundled into CRE CLOs were merged with funds from individual investors to acquire multifamily housing during the Covid era. After that, borrowing rates surged, catching many off guard. A significant portion of the deteriorating loans had floating-rate interest rates, putting massive pressure on landlords’ cash flows, diminishing the market worth of the properties, and obliterating equity in a large number of investments. 

According to data provider Trepp, $78.5 billion of CRE CLO loans are outstanding. This means many CRE CLO issuers are racing to find ways to prevent a tsunami of bad loans from defaulting or risk losing the fees they collect on the securities. 

Recent estimates from JPMorgan show lenders purchased $520 million of delinquent loans in the first quarter of this year. Lenders have been ramping up the number of buyouts over the last four quarters because of mounting bad loans in a period of elevated rates. 

Source: Bloomberg 

JPMorgan strategist Chong Sin said he’s surprised by lenders’ ability to obtain warehouse lines to purchase bad debt, given tightening credit conditions. 

“The reason these managers are engaged in buyouts is to limit delinquencies,” Sin said, adding, “The wild card here is, how long will financing costs remain low enough for them to do that?”

Anuj Jain, an analyst at Barclays Plc, expects buyouts to continue as distress increases across the CRE CLO space.  

“If the outlook for the Fed shifts materially to hikes or no rate cuts for a while, that might lead to a sharp increase in delinquencies, which can stifle issuers’ ability to buy out loans,” Jain said. 

Bloomberg explains much of the CLO space derives from multifamily bridge loans originated around 2021-2022: 

CRE CLO issuance surged to $45 billion in 2021, a 137% increase from two years earlier, when buyers of apartment blocks sought to profit from the wave of workers moving to the Sun Belt from big cities. Three-year loans would give them time to complete upgrades and refinance, the thinking went.

Fast forward to today and the debt underpinning many of the bonds is coming due for repayment at a time when there’s less appetite for real estate lending, insurance costs have skyrocketed and monetary policy remains tight. Hedges against borrowing cost increases are also expiring and cost significantly more to purchase now.

Those blows helped increase multifamily assets classed as distressed to almost $10 billion at the end of March, a 33% rise since the end of September, according to data compiled by MSCI Real Assets.

Last Wednesday, the Fed left interest rates unchanged at around 550bps as inflation data reaccelerates and economic growth tilts to the downside, stoking stagflation fears. 

Fed swaps are pricing in just under two cuts – this is down from nearly seven earlier this year and about 1.14 before last week’s FOMC. 

Meanwhile, bears are piling in on CRE CLO issuer Arbor Realty Trust Inc., with 40.3% of the float short, equivalent to 73 million shares short. 

“The multifamily CRE CLO market was not prepared for rate volatility,” said Fraser Perring, the founder of Viceroy Research, which has placed bear bets against Arbor, adding, “The result is significant distress.” 

The longer the Fed delays rate cuts, the worse the CRE mess will get. 

Stop! Stop! Stop! US Public Debt Will Reach $60 Trillion By End Of 10-year Budget Window

Stop! Stop! Stop! … all the printing!

These people have to be stopped!

We are talking about the nation’s unhinged monetary politburo domiciled in the Eccles Building (The Federal Reserve), of course. It is bad enough that their relentless inflation of financial assets has showered the 1% with untold trillions of windfall gains, but their ultimate crime is that they lured the nation’s elected politician into a veritable fiscal trance. Consequently, future generations will be lugging the service costs on insuperable public debts for years to come.

For more than two decades these foolish PhDs and monetary apparatchiks drove the entire Treasury yield curve to rock bottom, even as public debt erupted skyward. In this context, the single biggest chunk of the Treasury debt lies in the 90-day T-bill sector, but between December 2007 and June 2023 the inflation-adjusted yield on this workhorse debt security was negative 95% of the time.

That’s right. During that 187-month span, the interest rate exceeded the running (LTM) inflation rate during only nine months, as depicted by the purple area picking above the zero bound in the chart, and even then by just a tad. All the rest of the time, Uncle Sam was happily taxing the inflationary rise in nominal incomes, even as his debt service payments were dramatically lagging the 78% rise of CPI during that period.

Inflation-Adjusted Yield On 90-Day T-bills, 2007 to 2022

The above was the fiscal equivalent of Novocain. It enabled the elected politicians to merrily jig up and down Pennsylvania Avenue and stroll the K-Street corridors dispensing bountiful goodies left and right, while experiencing nary a moment of pain from the massive debt burden they were piling on the main street economy.

Accordingly, during the quarter-century between Q4 1997 and Q1 2022 the public debt soared from $5.5 trillion to $30.4 trillion or by 453%. In any rational world a commensurate rise in Federal interest expense would have surely awakened at least some of the revilers.

But not in Fed World. As it happened, Uncle Sam’s interest expense only increased by 73%, rising from $368 billion to $635 billion per year during the same period.  By contrast, had interest rates remained at the not unreasonable levels posted in late 1997, the interest expense level by Q1 2022, when the Fed finally awakened to the inflationary monster it had fostered, would have been $2.03 trillion per annum.

In short, the Fed reckless and relentless repression of interest rates during that quarter century fostered an elephant in the room that was one for the ages. Annualized Federal interest expense was fully $1.3 trillion lower than would have been the case at the yield curve in place in Q4 1997.

Alas, the missing interest expense amounted to the equivalent of the entire social security budget!

So, we’d guess the politicians might have been aroused from their slumber had interest expense reflected market rates. Instead, they were actually getting dreadfully wrong price signals and the present fiscal catastrophe is the consequence.

Index Of Public Debt Versus Federal Interest Expense, Q4 1997-Q1 2022

Needless to say, the US economy was not wallowing in failure or under-performance at the rates which prevailed in 1997. In fact, during that year real GDP growth was +4.5%, inflation posted at just 1.7%, real median family income rose by 3.2%, job growth was 2.8% and the real interest rates on the 10-year UST was +4.0%

In short, 1997 generated one of the strongest macroeconomic performances in recent decades—even with inflation-adjusted yields on the 10-year UST of +4.0%. So there was no compelling reason for a massive compression of interest rates, but that is exactly what the Fed engineered over the next two decades. As shown in the graph below, rates were systematically pushed lower by 300 to 500 basis points across the curve by the bottom in 2020-2021.

Current yields are higher by 300 to 400 basis points from this recent bottom, but here’s the thing: They are only back to nominal levels prevalent at the beginning of the period in 1997, even as inflation is running at 3-4% Y/Y increases, or double the levels of 1997.

US Treasury Yields, 1997 to 2024

Unfortunately, even as the Fed has tepidly moved toward normalization of yields as shown in the graph above, Wall Street is bringing unrelenting pressure for a new round of rates cuts, which would result in yet another spree of the deep interest rate repression and distortion that has fueled Washington’s fiscal binge since the turn of the century.

As it is, the public debt is already growing at an accelerating clip, even before the US economy succumbs to the recession that is now gathering force. And we do mean accelerating. The public debt has recently been increasing by $1 trillion every 100 days. That’s $10 billion per day, $416 million per hour.

In fact, Uncle Sam’s debt has risen by $470 billion in the first two months of this year to $34.5 trillion and is on pace to surpass $35 trillion in a little over a month, $37 trillion well before year’s end, and $40 trillion some time in 2025. That’s about two years ahead of the current CBO (Congressional Budget Office) forecast.

On the current path, moreover, the public debt will reach $60 trillion by the end of the 10-year budget window. But even that depends upon the CBO’s latest iteration of Rosy Scenario, which envisions no recession ever again, just 2% inflation as far as the eye can see and real interest rates of barely 1%. And that’s to say nothing of the trillions in phony spending cuts and out-year tax increases that are built into the CBO baseline but which Congress will never actually allow to materialize.

What is worse, even with partial normalization of rates, a veritable tsunami of Federal interest expense is now gathering steam. That is because the ultra-low yields of 2007 to 2022 are now rolling over into the current market rates shown above—at the same time that the amount of public debt outstanding is heading skyward. As a result, the annualized run rate of Federal interest expense hit $1.1 trillion in February and is heading for $1.6 trillion by the end of the current fiscal year in September.

Finally, even as the run-rate of interest expense has been soaring, the bureaucrats at the US Treasury have been drastically shortening the maturity of the outstanding debt, as it rolls over. Accordingly, more than $21 trillion of Treasury paper has been refinanced in the under one-year T-bill market, thereby lowering the weighted-average maturity of the public debt to less than five- years.

The apparent bet is that the Fed will be cutting rates soon. As is becoming more apparent by the day, however, that’s just not in the cards: No matter how you slice it, the running level of inflation has remained exceedingly sticky and shows no signs of dropping below its current 3-4% range any time soon.

What is also becoming more apparent by the day is that the money-printers at the Fed have led Washington into a massive fiscal calamity. It is only a matter of time, therefore, until the excrement hits the fan like never before.

And with Bidenomics killing off household excess savings, we won’t be going down to the nightclub anymore.

Surprise! Citi Economic Surprise Index Crashes To -7.30 (Home Prices UP 32% Under Biden, Mortgage Rates UP 160%)

Surprise! Just in time for the November election, this is a negative surprise that Biden doesn’t want to hear.

The Citi Economic Surprise index crashed to -7.30, the lowest since January 2023.

Under Biden’s leadership (hell, he and his family already own several mansions … on a Senator’s pay), home prices are up 32% under Biden and mortgage rates are up a staggering 160%.

Getting young households who rent to buy a home in this environment will require magic.

Biden’s Misrepresentation On Trump Tax Cuts, Someone Who Is Married With Two Kids Making $85,000 Will Pay $1,700 More In Taxes (Inflation Tax Is 166% Higher Than Under Trump)

I doubt if Biden really understands what he is saying. He simply reads (badly) off a teleprompter.

Biden has repeatedly claimed that no new taxes on anyone making less than $400,000. Remember, he has repeatedly said “You have my word as a Biden.” Which is worthless, by the way.

There are TWO taxes that are hitting people making under $400,000 per year. First, the INFLATION tax coming from Biden’s/Congresses spending binge, The Fed printing gobs of money, and insane regulations.

Biden and his mouthpieces like Karine Jean Pierre (KJP) claim that Biden inherited inflation from Trump. FALSE. Inflation was only 1.3% YoY in December 2020. Inflation was 3.5% YoY in March 2024, an increase of 166% over Trump’s final month in office. THAT is one heck of an inflation tax.

In House testimony, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (falsely) claimed that Biden’s massive tax increase won’t hit middle class households. That is a plain lie. the Tax Foundation said that someone who’s married, two kids, making $85,000 would pay $1,700 more in taxes. A married couple with two children making $165,000 annually would pay $2,450.50 more than in the previous year, while a family with three kids pulling in $200,000 per year will shell out almost $7,500 more per year.

So much for Biden’s “No one making under $400,000 will pay and additional penny of tax.” Between the inflation tax and Biden letting Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s (TCJA) expire, people making under $400,000 per year will get scalded. All so Biden/Congress can keep spending on Ukraine, fund endless wars, and buy countries cooperation with the US.

Yet Another Lousy Jobs Report! US Added Just 175k Jobs In April, Almost A 50% Drop In Revised March Estimate Of 315k Jobs Added (Rate Cut Odds Soar!)

Hey Joe! Where is the strongest jobs recovery in history??

 BLS reported that in April the US added just 175K jobs, a nearly 50% drop from the upward revised 315K (was 303K)…

.. and a huge miss to estimates of 240K… in fact, as shown below, this was the biggest miss since Dec 2021 

The weakness was pervasive, and while payrolls were a huge miss, the unemployment rate also rose more than expected, from 3.8% to 3.9%, vs estimates of an unchanged print.

Wages also eased back with average hourly earnings rising 0.2% MoM, below the expected 0.3% increase and down from last month’s 0.3% print. On an annual basis, earnings rose 3.9%, down from 4.1% last month and below the 4.0% estimate.

Where were the jobs added? Health care and social assistance with 87k jobs added.

Speaking of government, rate government unemployment rate fell 1.2% in April.

The lousy jobs report sent odds of a Fed rate cut soaring.

“C’mon Jay, cut rates for me!”

Janet Yellen Says It’s ‘Almost Impossible’ For First-Time Homebuyers To Enter Housing Market (Blames Rates Being Too Low That Households Locked-in Rates)

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told the House Ways and Means Committee that housing is impossible for first-time homebuyers. But doesn’t bother to confess that she is partly responsible because of her “too low for too long” Fed policies under Obama/Biden.

Yellen: Mortgage rates have been so low for so long that it’s created a lock-in effect where people don’t want to sell their homes to buy new ones for fear of losing their attractive rates.

That’s made it “almost impossible” for first-time homebuyers to enter the housing market, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said during her testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee.

Now hold on a minute, Janet. YOU were the one that kept rates too low for too long as Federal Reserve Chair.

Janet L. Yellen took office as chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in February 2014, for a four-year term ending February 3, 2018. She was succeeded by Jerome Powell.

What was her record on mortgage rates? Yellen kept the Fed target rate (upper bound) at 25 basis points under Obama/Biden until December 2015, so only one rate hike under Obama/Biden. Then came the election of Donald Trump in November 2016. Then Yellen raised The Fed target rate 4 times after Trump was elected.

Mortgage rates fell to 3.78% by November 2017, so Yellen helped keep mortgage rates low. But mortgage rates soared after Trump’s election to 4.22% by the end of her term.

There are other reasons why first-time homeownership is so difficult, like local NIMBY (not in my back yard) policies and the absolutely lousy labor market.

She added that Biden’s massive tax increase won’t hit middle class households (other than the massive INFLATION tax that was levied by Biden). That is a plain lie. the Tax Foundation says that someone who’s married, two kids, making $85,000 would pay $1,700 more in taxes. A married couple with two children making $165,000 annually would pay $2,450.50 more than in the previous year, while a family with three kids pulling in $200,000 per year will shell out almost $7,500 more per year.

So much for Biden’s “No one making under $400,000 will pay and additional penny of tax.”

My Kuroda! Japan Conducted Its Second Currency Intervention This Week (The Peril Of Bad Fiscal And Monetary Policies)

In the time (dis)honored tradition of Haruhiko Kuroda, the former governor of the Bank of Japan, Japan likely conducted its second currency intervention this week, current account figures from the central bank suggest, in another sign of the government’s intensified battle to prop up the yen.

Tokyo’s latest entry into the market was likely around ¥3.5 trillion ($22.5 billion), based on a comparison of Bank of Japan accounts and money broker forecasts.

The BOJ reported Thursday that its current account will probably fall ¥4.36 trillion due to fiscal factors on the next business day of Tuesday. That compares with the ¥833 billion average forecast by money brokers of what the number would be without intervention.

The figures, released less than a day after the yen jumped sharply during US trading hours, indicate that Japanese authorities made the unusual move of stepping into the market shortly after a Federal Reserve meeting when investors were still digesting the announcement. That would signal the finance ministry is taking an increasingly aggressive stance in what could become a prolonged fight to support the yen.

“With Japanese holidays and US jobs data coming up, it was a very good time for the authorities to tackle speculators,” said Yuya Kikkawa, an economist at Meiji Yasuda Research Institute. “This will have a great impact on the market. I sense a strong determination by the authorities to defend the 160-yen-per-dollar line.”

The latest swing in the yen follows a similarly sudden jump on Monday. Central bank accounts suggested Monday’s move was likely an intervention by Tokyo worth around ¥5.5 trillion, close to the daily record of ¥5.6 trillion set in October 2022.

Ahead of the move late Wednesday in New York and early Thursday in Tokyo, Central Tanshi Co. and Totan Research Co. had forecast a ¥700 billion decline in the BOJ’s current account balance due to fiscal factors including government bond issuance and tax payments. Ueda Yagi Tanshi projected the balance to drop by ¥1.1 trillion.

The calculations based on a comparison of those estimates and the central bank accounts offer only ballpark figures rather than specific amounts. Similar analysis proved accurate in showing that a jump in the yen in jittery markets in October 2023 was not the result of Japan stepping in to buy the currency.

The calculations also estimated the size of intervention on Oct. 21, 2022 at around ¥5.5 trillion, closely matching the actual amount.

An official monthly figure for the size of intervention will come out on May 31. Traders will need to wait until August or later to see daily operation data.

Japan’s top currency official Masato Kanda declined Thursday to comment on whether the finance ministry had intervened two hours earlier in Tokyo, when the yen strengthened sharply against the dollar. Japan’s currency briefly touched 153.04 from around the 157.50 mark.

Kanda oversaw the previous cycle of interventions in 2022. The ministry bought the yen around 30 minutes after the BOJ’s governor press conference ended in September that year. Another round of moves came a month later with back-to-back business day interventions.

The pattern of Japanese officials declining to comment is aimed at keeping market participants in the dark. A lack of immediate clarity may help keep traders more on edge and less willing to bet against the yen even if the ministry hasn’t actually taken action.

“By acting right after the Fed decision and outside of Japan hours, they dished out a warning that they are in a position to intervene 24 hours a day,” said Hirofumi Suzuki, chief FX strategist at Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp.

“We are still waiting for US employment figures during the Golden Week holidays and depending on the outcome of that data, there is a risk of further intervention,” he said.

The US is having its own currency problems under Biden with its own bad fiscal and monetary polcies. The Purchasing Power of the US Dollars has fallen 17% under Biden.

Fed Will Likely Pause For 6th Straight Meeting (Mortgage Rates Are Already Up 161% Under Biden, MBS Returns Terrible!)

The Fed will likely pause rate cuts/increases when The Fed reveals their plans today.

Breaking: Federal Reserve officials are likely to hold interest rates steady at 5.25-5.5%—a 20-year peak—for a 6th consecutive meeting.

With inflation still high, rate cuts seem off the table for now.

Rate decision at 2pm Washington time.

The Street seems aligned.

Conforming rates are already up 161% under Biden.

According to Fed Funds Futures, no rate changes until after the Presidential election.

MBS returns have been abysmal under Biden/Powell.