…but in context, that shift up to 3.96mm SAAR homes sold is nothing…
Source: Bloomberg
High borrowing costs have led to a shortage of previously owned homes on the market, discouraging many would-be home sellers from listing their properties for sale and having to part with their current low financing costs.
“Additional job gains and continued economic growth appear assured, resulting in growing housing demand,” NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun said in a prepared statement.
“While mortgage rates remain elevated, they are expected to stabilize.”
Last month, the inventory of available homes edged up 0.7% to 1.37 million, continuing to trend higher although well below pre-pandemic levels.
Despite the weakness in sales, tight inventory is keeping prices elevated, yielding one of the least affordable housing markets on record. The median sale price last month increased 4% from a year earlier to $407,200, the highest ever for any October, the NAR figures show.
Contract signings rose in all four US regions, led by a 6.7% jump in the Midwest.
Sales of single-family homes increased 3.5% in October; purchases of condominiums and co-ops were up 2.7%
Finally, while that’s all very exciting – a scintilla of growth off almost record lows – the fecal matter is about to strike the rotating object as rising mortgage rates lagged impact threatens…
Source: Bloomberg
In October, 59% of homes sold were on the market for less than a month, compared with 57% in September, and 19% sold above the list price. Properties remained on the market for 29 days on average, compared with 28 days in the previous month. First-time buyers made up 27% of purchases, still historically low.
Fortunately, the Biden/Harris administration is winding down. On the mortgage side, the mortgage market is already gone under Biden/Harris where mortgage purchase applications are down a whopping 60%.
Mortgage applications increased 1.7 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending November 15, 2024.
The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, increased 1.7 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index decreased 1 percent compared with the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 2 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 3 percent compared with the previous week and was 1 percent lower than the same week one year ago. And down -60% under Biden/Harris.
The Refinance Index increased 2 percent from the previous week and was 43 percent higher than the same week one year ago.
Slowing economy, rising rates, too expensive housing. Not a good sign for the mortgage market.
As Biden/Harris approve of Ukraine launching missiles against Russia risking nuclear war, we are witnessing a slow down in the US economy. This time, housing starts and permits.
US Housing Starts and Building Permits disappointed in October with the former dropping 3.1% MoM (-1.5% exp) and -0.6% MoM (+0.7% exp) respectively. This is the second straight month of declines for both measures of housing activity.
Source: Bloomberg
That pulled the SAAR totals down to four month lows – hovering just above COVID lockdown levels…
Source: Bloomberg
Under the hood, it was very mixed with Single-family permits rising and multifamily permits dropped. Single-family Starts plunged while multi-family Starts jumped…
Source: Bloomberg
As rate-cut expectations have fallen, so have homebuilders actions it seems…
Source: Bloomberg
But homebuilder ‘hope’ remains high…
Source: Bloomberg
With Trump back in charge, how much will Powell and his pals really want to cut rates now?
A recent paper by Michael Stegman, Ted Tozer and Richard Green reminds me of The Who’s song “Won’t Get Fooled Again.” Except that apparently Stegman, Tozer and Green did get fooled again.
I remember testifying in the House of Representatives in Washington DC on the financial crisis and housing markets. I pointed out that low down payment mortgages lending to households with low credit scores was very dangerous. I had the data and presented it to the House committee on financial services.
The problem with Stegman et al’s paper is that it ignores The Federal Reserve and Federal spending. After the financial crisis of 2008 when housing prices declined (especially in bubble states like Arizona, Nevada and Florida), Berananke and Yellen adopted a zero interest rate policy that resulted in housing prices rising again. Then we have Powell’s lowering of rates to near-zero following the Covid outbreak and the insane level of Federal spending that ensued helping to drive housing prices to dangerous bubble levels. Making first time homeowner purchases almost impossible.
So, like the 2000s, the pursuit of homeownership will lead to insance policy proposals. If nothing else, the Stegman et al proposal will lead to MORE inflation in housing prices and set the stage for a housing bubble burst of epic proportions.
Apparently, Stegman et al DID get fooled again. Or they just don’t care.
After yesterday’s in line – but really cooler than whispered – CPI which restored hope in a December rate cut, all eyes are on this morning’s PPI print to boost dovish hopes that the Fed’s easing cycle would remain on track. It was not meant to be, however, as the PPI came in hotter than expected across the board on both a monthly and annual basis.
Starting at the top, headline PPI rose 0.2% MoM (in line with the +0.2% expected) but September was revised higher from 0.0% to 0.1%; meanwhile on an annual basis, headline PPI rose 2.4%, higher than the 2.3% expected, with the last month also revised higher from 1.8% to 1.9%.
Unlike last month when a drop in energy prices weighed heavily on the headline PPI number, this month energy subtracted just 0.02% from the final print, the lowest detraction since July. Meanwhile, Services added a hefty 0.179% to the bottom line number.
Indeed, according to the BLS, most of the rise in final demand prices can be traced to a 0.% advance in the index for final demand services. Prices for final demand goods inched up 0.1%, the first increase in the index since July.
Taking a closer look at the components:
Final demand services: The index for final demand services increased 0.3 percent in October after rising 0.2 percent in September. Over three-fourths of the broad-based advance in October is attributable to prices for final demand services less trade, transportation, and warehousing, which moved up 0.3 percent. The indexes for final demand transportation and warehousing services and for final demand trade services also increased, 0.5 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively. (Trade indexes measure changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers.)
Product detail:
Over one-third of the rise in the index for final demand services can be traced to prices for portfolio management, which advanced 3.6 percent. The indexes for machinery and vehicle wholesaling; airline passenger services; computer hardware, software, and supplies retailing; outpatient care (partial); and cable and satellite subscriber services also moved higher.
In contrast, margins for apparel, footwear, and accessories retailing fell 3.7 percent. Prices for securities brokerage, dealing, investment advice, and related services and for truck transportation of freight also declined.
Final demand goods: The index for final demand goods inched up 0.1 percent in October following two consecutive decreases. The advance can be traced to a 0.3-percent rise in prices for final demand goods less foods and energy. Conversely, the indexes for final demand energy and for final demand foods declined 0.3 percent and 0.2 percent, respectively.
Product detail:
An 8.4-percent increase in the index for carbon steel scrap was a major factor in the advance in prices for final demand goods. The indexes for meats, diesel fuel, fresh and dry vegetables, and oilseeds also moved higher.
In contrast, prices for liquefied petroleum gas fell 18.1 percent. The indexes for chicken eggs, processed poultry, and ethanol also decreased.
Even more problematic for the doves, however, is that core PPI jumped to +3.1% YoY (hotter than the 3.0% exp) with the prior month revised higher to 2.9% from 2.8%. This was the second hottest print going back to March 2023 with just the June outlier surge hotter than October…
… as sticky Services costs continue to rise.
The hotter than expected PPIs have pushed yields and the dollar higher, even as the market waits to see the details of what impact today’s numbers will have on the Fed’s preferred core PCE metric – according to UBS key PPI components to PCE look hot – although Bloomberg noted a big jump in air passenger services (3.2%), which suggests some upside risks (i.e., 0.3% core PCE).
The most notable takeaway from the data appears to be the increase in final demand for services in October, which is similar to the factors that increased CPI yesterday — shelter, food and energy, which are components the Fed cannot control with interest rates.
Bottom line: this is a long way from the Fed’s mandated 2%, and it’s moving in the wrong direction, something which has not been lost on the market, where Treasury curves are flattening after the data, which suggests traders are wavering over the prospects of a December rate cut. That has yet to be reflected in rates markets — bets have been trimmed but marginally, not enough to really change the swaps market outlook as of now. According to BBG’s Vince Cignarella, sizeable block trades are going through Treasuries, mostly in the five-year tenor and some ten-year tenors, which looks like positioning for higher yields and flatter curves.
There is one way out of the inflation trap. And it’s drill, baby, drill!
For the 53rd straight month, core consumer prices rose on a MoM basis in October with the YoY pace re-accelerating to +3.33%.
The shelter index increased 4.9 percent over the last year, accounting for over 65 percent of the total 12-month increase in the all items less food and energy index.
Thank goodness Harris can’t try to impliment her ridiculous plans to boost housing!
Glad to see Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk (the NEW Two Bobs from Office Space) cleaning up the mess in Washington DC.
The US Treasury yield curve (10Y-2Y CMT) went negative on April 1, 2024. And remains positive.
The US Treasury 10Y-2Y CMT (constant maturity Treasury) peaked locally on March 29, 2024 and then fell, eventually turning negative on April 1, 2024. And remained negative until August 30, 2024 just prior to the election. It looks like the yield curve accurately predicted the election of Trump.
The 10-year Treasury yield is rising with a positive economic outlook under Trump. And with that optimism we see mortgage rates rising too.
The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, decreased 10.8 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier. On an unadjusted basis, the Index decreased 12 percent compared with the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 5 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 7 percent compared with the previous week and was 2 percent higher than the same week one year ago.
The Refinance Index decreased 19 percent from the previous week and was 48 percent higher than the same week one year ago.
“Ten-year Treasury rates remain volatile and continue to put upward pressure on mortgage rates. The 30-year fixed rate last week increased to 6.81 percent, the highest level since July,” said Joel Kan, MBA’s Vice President and Deputy Chief Economist. “Applications decreased for the sixth consecutive week, with purchase activity falling to its lowest level since mid-August and refinance activity declining to the lowest level since May. The average loan size on a refinance application dropped below $300,000, as borrowers with larger loans tend to be more sensitive to any given changes in mortgage rates.”
The refinance share of mortgage activity decreased to 39.9 percent of total applications from 43.1 percent the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity increased to 7.0 percent of total applications.
The FHA share of total applications decreased to 15.5 percent from 16.4 percent the week prior. The VA share of total applications decreased to 12.5 percent from 14.6 percent the week prior. The USDA share of total applications increased to 0.5 percent from 0.4 percent the week prior.
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($766,550 or less) increased to 6.81 percent from 6.73 percent, with points decreasing to 0.68 from 0.69 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans. The effective rate increased from last week.
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with jumbo loan balances (greater than $766,550) increased to 6.98 percent from 6.77 percent, with points increasing to 0.65 from 0.49 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate increased from last week.
The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages backed by the FHA increased to 6.75 percent from 6.55 percent, with points decreasing to 0.87 from 0.94 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate increased from last week.
The average contract interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 6.21 percent from 6.27 percent, with points decreasing to 0.55 from 0.77 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.
The average contract interest rate for 5/1 ARMs decreased to 6.05 percent from 6.20 percent, with points increasing to 0.84 from 0.59 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.
The bond market is reacting to the election of Trump with a clear Bear Steepening.
Bear steepening happens when yields move up across tenors, but long-end yields move up even faster than short-end yields.
This isn’t going to help mortgage applications due to lowering rates.
The office sector of commercial real estate has been in a depression for about two years, with prices of older office towers plunging by 50%, 60%, or 70% from their last transaction, and sometimes even more, with some office towers selling for land value, with the building by itself being worth next to nothing even in Manhattan.
Landlords of office buildings are having trouble collecting enough in rent to even pay the interest on their loans, and they’re having trouble or are finding it impossible to refinance a maturing loan, and so many of them have stopped making interest payments on their mortgages, and delinquencies continue to spike.
The delinquency rate of office mortgages backing commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) spiked to 9.4% in October, up a full percentage point from September, and the highest since the worst months of the meltdown that followed the Financial Crisis. The delinquency rate has doubled since June 2023 (4.5%), according to data by Trepp, which tracks and analyzes CMBS.
Office CRE fund managers have spread the rumor that office CRE has bottomed out, but the CMBS delinquency rate doesn’t agree with this bottomed-out scenario; it’s aggressively spiking.
Three months ago, the delinquency rate surpassed the surge in delinquencies that followed the American Oil Bust from 2014 through 2016, when hundreds of companies in the US oil-and-gas sector filed for bankruptcy as the price of oil had collapsed due to overproduction, which devastated the Houston office market in 2016.
But now there’s a structural problem that won’t easily go away with the price of oil: A huge office glut has emerged after years of overbuilding and industry hype about the “office shortage” that led big companies to hog office space as soon as it came on the market with the hope they’d grow into it. However, during the pandemic, companies realized that they don’t need all this office space, and vast portions of it sits there vacant and for lease, with vacancy rates in the 25% to 36% range in the biggest markets.
Mortgages are considered delinquent by Trepp when the borrower fails to make the interest payment after the 30-day grace period. A mortgage is not considered delinquent here if the borrower continues to make the interest payment but fails to pay off the mortgage when it matures. This kind of repayment default, while the borrower is current on interest, would be on top of the delinquency rate here.
Loans are pulled off the delinquency list if the interest gets paid, or if the loan is resolved through a foreclosure sale, generally involving big losses for the CMBS holders, or if a deal gets worked out between landlord and the special servicer that represents the CMBS holders, such as the mortgage being restructured or modified and extended.
Survive till 2025 has been the motto. But that might not work either. The Fed has cut its policy rate by 50 basis points in September and is likely to cut more but in smaller increments. Many CRE loans are floating-rate loans that adjust to a short-term rate (SOFR), and short-term rates move largely with the Fed’s policy rates. And floating-rate loans will have lower interest rates as the Fed cuts.
Long-term rates, including fixed-rate mortgage rates have risen sharply since the Fed started cutting rates, so that option isn’t appealing.
So the hope in the CRE industry is that rate cuts will be steep and many, thereby reducing floating-rate interest payments, making it easier for landlords to meet them. And so the prescription was: Survive till 2025, when interest rates would be, they hope, far lower than they were.
But rate cuts will do nothing to address the structural issues that office CRE faces. The landlord of a nearly empty older office tower isn’t going to be able to make the interest payment even at a lower rate when the tower is largely vacant.
And these older office towers face the brunt of the vacancy rates, amid a flight to quality now feasible because of vacancies even at the latest and greatest properties. And there are a lot of these older office towers around that have been refinanced at very high valuations in the years before the pandemic, but whose valuations have now plunged by 50%, 60%, or 70%, and they have become a nightmare for lenders and CMBS holders.
Congress went wild spending on Covid relief and related wasteful spending. Notice that the impetus for job openings (spending) occurred before “Angry Joe” Biden and Commie-la Harris were sworn in. So, the job creation claims by Biden/Harris were put into motion before they assumed office.
The lag in job openings growth after the surge in spending is clearly visible in the following chart, as is the BURNOUT in job openings growth after Covid spending burned out.
Harris is promising explosive spending if elected. And she is promising MORE regulations! And the regulatory burden will grow.
Confounded Interest - Anthony B. Sanders 
You must be logged in to post a comment.