Biden Press Secretary KARINE JEAN-PIERRE: “The American people are beginning to feel Bidenomics”
Prices are up 16.6% and real wages are down 3% since Biden took office.
Well, at least Jean-Pierre didn’t claim like her boss Joe Biden claimed that he “ended cancer as we know it.”
But getting back to Jean-Pierre’s claim that “The American people are beginning to feel Bidenomics.” She is right (for once). Americans are REALLY feeling Bidenomics. And it hurts SO BAD!!!
What hurts so bad? Food (CRB Foodstuffs) are up 56% under Bidenomics. Real weekly wage growth is down -90% since Biden assumed office. Regular gas prices are up 52%. And the 30Y mortgage rate is up a staggering 153%. Yes, Karine, this hurts so bad!
While real wages are down -3% under Biden and the real average weekly wage growth is down -90%. That REALLY hurts so good.
Treasury Secretary Janet “Too Low For Too Long” Yellen, and former Federal Reserve Chair, is partly responsible for a phenomenon plaguing America: the death of starter homes.
As Mish has discussed, with main markets no longer an option for first-time buyers, Point2 looked at the country’s 100 largest secondary cities for the median price of a starter home and renter households’ median income. Defined as large non-core cities within a metro, these cities used to be fruitful house-hunting grounds for first-time buyers exploring less-expensive options away from main cities. But as it turns out, unaffordability can put a dent in homeownership plans regardless of city type or size.
In 41 of the 100 largest secondary cities in the U.S., renters earn half or less than half of the income they would need to buy a median-priced starter home.
There are no non-core cities in which renters could comfortably make a move toward homeownership: In 10 cities, the necessary income is about triple what they earn.
Would-be buyers in Burbank and Glendale, CA have it worst: They lack 67% of the income they would need in order to make the move from renter to homeowner.
Renters in 9 California cities would need to earn about $100,000 more in order to afford a starter home. Based on the latest renter income figures, starter home prices, and mortgage rates, non-core cities in the LA and San Diego metros are the toughest for first-time homebuyers.
In 15 of the 100 largest secondary cities, renters would need less than 4 months’ worth of extra income to afford the transition to owning a starter home.
Homeownership is within reach in Independence, MO, and Broken Arrow, OK. Those who dream of owning here would need less than one month’s worth of extra income to afford a starter home.
California Tops the List of Worst Places to Look
California has the dubious distinction of having the top least affordable starter home cities.
A starter home, according to the Census Department is priced in the bottom third of homes in the area.
Pomona, CA, is in fourteenth place. The average renter in Pomona makes $49,000 a year and needs to get to $121,000 a year. That’s nearly 2.5 times current salary.
In Burbank, CA, the average renter makes $63,000 year an needs to get to $193,000. That’s over 3 times current salary.
Within Grasp
In no market can the average renter make the plunge.
But in Independence, Missouri, or Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, the average renter is respectively just 2% and 5% short of the amount needed for a starter home
Not Shocking
None of this is shocking. It matches one one should expect looking at Case-Shiller home prices and mortgage rates.
The Fed wanted to produce inflation and it did. But for years the Fed did not even see the inflation because the manifestation of inflation was in asset prices, not the price of consumer goods.
Case-Shiller Top City Home Prices Decline From Year Ago for the First Time Since May 2012
Housing starts, like mortgage purchase demand, remains depressed compared to the housing bubble of the 2000s.
Now, will The anticipated Fed pause in rate hiking help? Not likely. The Fed still has over $8 trillion in monetary stimulus chasing assets. Too much Stimulypto.
US inflation is causing The Federal Reserve to raise interest rates, and mortgage applications are suffering.
Mortgage applications decreased 7.7 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending February 10, 2023.
The Refinance Index decreased 13 percent from the previous week and was 76 percent lower than the same week one year ago. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 6 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 5 percent compared with the previous week and was 43 percent lower than the same week one year ago.
The MBA contract rate rose 3.4% from 6.18% to 6.39% as The Fed tightens.
And if you believe the Taylor Rule (as opposed to The Fed’s current politically-based decisions), The Fed’s target rate should be 10.15% and The Fed is less than half way there at 4.75%.
The Fed is expected (by investors in Fed Funds Futures) to rise to 5.283% by the July FOMC meeting, then decline to under 5% by January ’24.
Speaking of Fed rate hikes, January’s red hot retail sales (up 3% MoM) is surely going to drive inflation UP and The Fed will keep raising rates.
Years ago, Brent Ambrose, Michael Lacour-Little and I wrote a paper on the US 30-year jumbo mortgage spread over conforming 30-year mortgage rates entitled “The effect of conforming loan status on mortgage yield spreads: a loan level analysis.” But that paper was written before Covid and the dramatic distortion caused in mortgage markets by The Federal Reserve’s massive increase in money.
Here is the spread between Bankrate’s 30-year mortgage rate and their 30-year JUMBO mortgage. Notice that between 2007 and early 2020, the median “jumbo spread” was 49 basis points. But after Covid and The Fed’s counterattack (by printing M2 Money), the median Jumbo spread from 4/1/2020 to today is only 1 basis point.
In the following chart, you can see the jumbo mortgage rate (yellow) against the conforming mortgage rate (white) and there is almost always a spread between the two UNTIL 2020 where we saw M2 Money growth (green line) spike and The Fed increased their purchases of Agency MBS (purple line). Since Covid and The Fed’s massive reaction, the jumbo rate and conforming rate are virtually the same. In fact, the latest jumbo spread is 1 basis point over the conforming rate.
Why is this happening? One explanation is that demand from the investors who ultimately buy jumbo mortgages. The strong demand by investors appears to have driven down the yields on jumbos relative to conventional loans, especially as the use and accessibility to jumbos has grown.
A second explanation is that Loan Level Price Adjustments that were added to conforming loans post-financial crisis never went away (until just recently on selected loans). This makes jumbos and conforming loans very close in yield.
So, when will the mortgage market return to normal and jumbo mortgages go back to the normal 50 basis point spread? We may see normalization if The Fed speeds up its withdrawal from markets. Also, getting rid of Loan Level Price Adjustments would help normalized the mortgage market.
But things are getting stressed in jumboland (California) where home prices are crashing in 5 of the top 8 metro areas.
Harry Houdini couldn’t have created a more tantalizing mystery … and one I wish would go away.
Confounded Interest - Anthony B. Sanders 
You must be logged in to post a comment.