Nobody but Biden could so handicap an economy with horrible fiscal policies, massive debt, inflation and open borders. And then go to the Virgin Islands for yet another taxpayer paid vacation. Biden has spent 40% of his Presidency on vacations.
Bidenomics is a disaster for the US middle class. And Bidenomics with its inflation has led The Fed to counterattack and raises interest rates, leading to losses for The Federal Reserve (which is paid for by US Treasury) of over $130 billion.
The Fed’s balance sheet shrank by $11.3BN last week to its lowest level since March 2021, but still remains elevated.
Source: Bloomberg
Usage of The Fed’s bank bailout facility rose by another $4.5BN last week to a new record high of $136BN…
Source: Bloomberg
The BTFP-Fed Arb continues to offer ‘free-money’ (and usage of the BTFP has risen by $26.7BN since the arb existed):
The rate on the Fed’s Bank Term Funding Program – which allows banks and credit unions to borrow funds for up to one year, pledging US Treasuries and agency debt as collateral valued at par – is the one-year overnight index swap rate plus 10 basis points.
That figure is currently 4.83%, down from 5.59% in September.
For institutions that have an account at the Fed, they can borrow from the BTFP at 4.83% and park that at the central bank to earn 5.40% – the interest on reserve balances.
Source: Bloomberg
The 57bp spread is the widest level since the Fed introduced the facility to support a struggling banking system after the collapse of California’s Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in New York.
After witnessing three of the four largest bank failures in U.S. history in 2023, the attention of the media and the markets has turned elsewhere. Banking crisis? It is as though it never happened. Having fallen by some 40 percent in March, the NASDAQ Bank Index has recovered to within 15 percent of its high from February. In the last few months, nearly all markets have gone on a bull run, including bank stocks.
Yet, and despite the relative quiet, the banking sector is not in great shape. Here are some of the reasons why.
Banks continue to lose deposits. According to data from the Federal Deposit Insurance. Corp. (FDIC), U.S. banks have now lost deposits for six consecutive quarters. While the pace has slowed from the first quarter of 2023, in which nearly $500 billion of deposits were removed from the banking system, approximately $190 billion of deposits have been withdrawn in the last two quarters. Indeed, U.S. banks have lost a net $1.1 trillion of deposits since the beginning of 2022 when interest rates began to rise.
With customer deposits growing scarce, U.S. banks are instead relying on emergency funding lines from the Federal Reserve Banks and the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system. FHLB bond capital raising, of which the proceeds are used to fund the banks, is up 89 percent year over year through November and looks set to reach $1.1 trillion for 2023. Use of the Bank Term Funding Program, the emergency line put in place by the Fed in March 2023, reached an all-time high last week at $131.3 billion.
This does not reflect normal market operations.
This is a sign that the bank funding markets aren’t operating properly, and that the regulators are stepping in to help prop up the system.
The growing gap between the rate on the Federal Reserve’s nascent funding facility and what the central bank pays institutions parking reserves suggests officials will let the program expire in March, according to Wrightson ICAP.
“In justifying the generous terms of the original program, the Fed cited the ‘unusual and exigent’ market conditions facing the banking industry following last spring’s deposit runs,” Wrightson ICAP economist Lou Crandall wrote in a note to clients.
“It would be difficult to defend a renewal in today’s more normal environment.”
What happens then?]
So much for the liabilities side. But banks face challenges on the asset side as well.
Unrealized losses on investment securities, which is the same problem that got SVB into trouble a year ago, continue to rise. U.S. banks reported unrealized losses of over $684 billion in the third quarter, up 22 percent from the second quarter. Of these unrealized losses on securities, $294 billion are categorized as available for sale (AFS), as opposed to held to maturity (HTM), whereby the bank intends to hold the asset and (hopefully) recapture principle at the end of the term. The high amount of AFS suggests that if interest rates remain “higher for longer,” then a portion of these losses will begin to realize in 2024 as they are sold by the banks. This will pressure profitability and capital levels.
Net income is declining across the banking system generally, but particularly among the smaller community banks. Credit quality is deteriorating, but has not yet reached crisis level. Commercial real estate continues to drive the increase in problem loans.
To grow (or at least slow the decline) of deposits, banks are going to have offer rates that are somewhat competitive with money market funds (considering that bank deposits are insured by the FDIC and thus relatively safe), and that offer positive real (i.e., after inflation) returns. With inflation persisting in the range of 3–4 percent, this means that banks will have to offer 4–5 percent to be relevant. This isn’t going to work for the banks. They won’t be able to maintain profitability. And it won’t work for the U.S. Treasury, which itself is committed to trillion-dollar bond issuances each quarter, which also must offer a positive interest rate above investor perceptions of inflation and the deteriorating fiscal condition of the U.S. government.
If funding costs rise further, or if unrealized losses begin to realize, banks will start taking hits to their capital levels. This will spook the markets, including depositors, and we may find ourselves in round two of deposit runs. To head off these challenges, some banks are looking to merge. There have been 78 bank deals announced in the second half of 2023, mostly among the smaller and community banks. But this won’t work in many situations where the result is the proverbial “two drunks holding each other up.”
Investor optimism is permeating markets going into year-end, with most all asset classes continuing to rise. But we must not lose sight of the banks. They are not out of the woods yet. While there is a “goldilocks” scenario in which the banking sector makes a soft landing, the risk of another set of bank failures in 2024 remains meaningful.
And we have 21 straight weeks of negative growth in bank credit. And The Fed still has a staggering amount of financial stimulus outstanding.
With all hell breaking loose around the world, President Biden has gone on yet another vacation, this time to the Virgin Islands to stay at the home of a big donor. But his handlers run things, not Vacation Joe.
C’mon Joe. The media has always reported bad news. Warm and fuzzy doesn’t anger people, but bad news does! And under Bidenomics, there has been a lot of bad news.
President Biden railed against corporate media before he and several family members headed by helicopter to Camp David, the presidential retreat in the mountains of western Maryland.
Before boarding the presidential helicopter, Biden was asked by one reporter: “What’s your outlook on the economy next year?”
The president responded: “All good,” adding, “Take a look. Start reporting it the right way.”
Sounds like Biden watched the Travola/Jackson flick “Basic” where the infamous line was uttered “Tell the story right.”
OK Joey, let’s tell the story right. After the horrendous economic shutdowns of local economics and schools in 2020, 15.1 million jobs were added after the shutdowns ended in just 10 months. Wow, that was simple! But under Biden’s Reign of Economic Error, only 15.5 million jobs were added over the next 34 months.
But Biden’s record on jobs comes at the expense of an additional $6.25 TRILLION IN PUBLIC DEBT.
With $34 trillion and rapdily growing debt and budget deficits, it is hard to find good news about Bidenomics.
So much for “The Fed killed inflation” narrative. Inflation is still alive and well in housing prices. Particularly in cities like Miami and Detroit? Maybe the Lions winning their division for the first time in 30 years helped!
The S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price NSA Index, covering all nine U.S. census divisions, reported a 4.8% annual change in October, up from a 4% change in the previous month. The 10-City Composite showed an increase of 5.7%, up from a 4.8% increase in the previous month. The 20-City Composite posted a year-over-year increase of 4.9%, up from a 3.9% increase in the previous month. Detroit reported the highest year-over-year gain among the 20 cities with an 8.1% increase in October, followed again by San Diego with a 7.2% increase. Portland fell 0.6% and remained the only city reporting lower prices in October versus a year ago.
The Case-Shiller National Home Price index was up 4.8% in October as The Federal Reserve keeps its monstrous foot on the balance sheet pedal.
Home prices in America’s 20 largest cities rose for the 9th straight month in October (the latest data released by S&P Global Case-Shiller today), up 0.64% MoM (slightly better than the +0.60% MoM expected).
That pushed the YoY rise in prices up 4.87% – the fastest pace since Dec ’22…
Source: Bloomberg
…but as the chart shows the MoM gains are slowing rapidly.
“U.S. home prices accelerated at their fastest annual rate of the year in October”, says Brian D. Luke, Head of Commodities, Real & Digital assets at S&P DJI.
“We are experiencing broad based home price appreciation across the country, with steady gains seen in nineteen of twenty cities.”
Miami and Detroit saw the biggest MoM gains while the West Coast dominated the MoM price declines with San Francisco, Portland, and Seattle worst.
But, judging by the resumption of the rise of mortgage rates since the Case-Shiller data was created, we would expect prices to also resume their decline…
Source: Bloomberg
So prices are up, mortgage rates are actually falling again now (lagged)… so The Fed is re-blowing the same bubble?
Well, at least Detroit is near the top! Playing in Rocket Mortgage stadium.
The ‘Misery Index’ is near its lowest level since pre-COVID, but Misery Index masks the true horrors of Bidennomics: 20% higher food prices, 19% higher rents and 61% higher gasoline prices under Bidenomics.
The sum of U.S. unemployment and inflation – known as the “misery index” – fell to 6.8% in November from 7.5% the previous month. That’s the lowest since the summer and fast approaching pre-Covid levels.
The misery index is calculated by adding up the current unemployment rate (3.7%) and the inflation rate (3.1%). The formula provides a simple way to gauge whether the well-being of Americans is improving or not.
Misery peaked in April 2020 when the index spiked to 15%, the highest since 1982. Conditions have improved since the early onset of Covid, but it hasn’t been smooth sailing.
After falling back to 7.7% in January 2021, the index re-accelerated over the next two years as inflation surged. The misery index was 12.5% in June 2022—the same month that annual inflation hit 9.1%.
The unemployment component of the index has been faring well since Covid emergency measures were lifted back in 2021. The unemployment rate has remained below 4% for nearly two years—even as the economy begins to slow.
But economists warn that the misery index doesn’t offer a complete picture of how the average American is doing.
You can tell just by asking them how they feel about the economy and personal finances.
How do Americans really feel?
Economist Greg Ip, who heads economic commentary at The Wall Street Journal, compared the misery index to the University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment index—one of the most closely-watched consumer surveys.
“Based on historic correlations, sentiment has been more depressed this year than you would expect given the level of economic misery,” Ip wrote, arguing that consumers are more pessimistic than the misery index would suggest.
A deeper dive into the sentiment data reveals that Americans are still frustrated about inflation and the impact of high interest rates on their finances. And while the consumer sentiment index rose in December—breaking a four-month skid—some economists attributed it to a temporary holiday boost ahead of Christmas.
“Consumer spirits are perking up for the holiday season which is a sign Christmas is still coming this year,” said Christopher Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBONDS, a New York-based financial research company.
A separate sentiment survey from LSEG/Ipsos paints an even less enthusiastic picture of the average consumer.
The December primary consumer sentiment index—which measures Americans’ attitudes toward jobs, investments, the economy, and personal finances—declined from November and was only up slightly compared to 12 months earlier.
According to the survey, attitudes toward the current situation, investments, and jobs “showed significant declines this month.”
The impact of cumulative inflation
As Creditnews Research reported in a recent study, Americans aren’t celebrating the slowdown in inflation because they’re still reeling from the cumulative price increases of the past three years.
While inflation has fallen to 3.1%, consumer prices have increased by a cumulative 19% since the start of 2020. Food prices are up a whopping 25% over that period.
Americans spent the better part of two years—April 2021 to January 2023—seeing inflation grow faster than their paychecks. That trend reversed in February of this year.
But even with stronger purchasing power this year, the vast majority of Americans (92%) said they reduced their spending in the six months through September, according to a Morning Consult survey for CNBC.
A majority of respondents across all wage brackets said current economic conditions negatively impacted their finances.
So, while the Misery Index indicates that the inflation RATE has slowed, it masks the fact that Americans are far worse off under Bidenomics.
Biden is lucky in that many portray him as a senile, dumb US Senator who happens to be President. Perhaps Biden is actually insidious allowing for open borders in the hopes of crashing the US economy by overloading the welfare system and driving national debt through the roof?
Biden, like Clinton and Obama before him, has been a Cloward-Piven discipile. Who are Cloward and Piven you ask? Two sociologists at Columbia University. (Cloward pass away in 2001, while Piven is still living). Here are Cloward and Piven attending the Voter Registration (aka, Motor Voter Law) Act signing by President “Willie Slick” Clinton.
The Cloward-Piven strategy is to overload the welfare system to the point of chaos, take control and implement Marxism through government force. To that extent, Biden and his incoherent sidekick, Kamala Harris, have been wildly successful. Sociology and Political Science are two of the most worthless college degrees (with Management in the Business School being a close third). Taking advice from Sociologists or Political Science majors or faculty is insane.
Biden should be familiar to Latin American, African and Chinese immigrants who are used to Marxist dictators who try to have their political opponents taken of the ballots and prosecucted.
Yes, the US welfare rolls are overflowing with illegal immigrants and unfunded liabilities are out of control. Perhaps Biden and Harris should be replaced with Cloward and Piven (even though Cloward is dead). But Newsom, Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama share the idiocy of the Columbia sociology faculty members. Hillary even teaches a course at Columbia!
What about compassion for immigrants? Great! Let’s close the borders and return to LEGAL immigration to halt human trafficking, Fentanyl imports, and cartels controlling the border. But Cloward-Piven’s strategy is best accomplished with open borders and weak-willed politicians.
Of course, investors don’t care about actual fundamentals, rates are down so ‘buy buy buy’ the builders…
Source: Bloomberg
Trouble is, even as mortgage rates have plunged recently, applications for home purchases has continued to decline…
Source: Bloomberg
And while mortgage rates have declined (rapidly), they remain massively high relative to the effective mortgage rate for all Americans. That difference is the ‘subsidy‘ that homebuilders have to fill to enable buyers – and it’s still yuuuge!
Source: Bloomberg
So, just how many new homes were sold in November?
The last few months have been very choppy for new home sales but November clarified that homebuilders just hit a wall on their subsidization!
New home sales crashed 12.2% MoM – the biggest MoM drop since April 2022. That dragged the YoY change to just 1.4%…
Source: Bloomberg
9 of the last 10 months have seen downward revisions to the new home sales SAAR!
Source: Bloomberg
New home sales fell in the South by the most, followed by the West. The Northeast and Midwest saw increased sales…
Source: Bloomberg
The new home sales SAAR printed 590k (well below the 690k exp) – the lowest since Nov 2022… catching down to existing home sales reality…
Source: Bloomberg
And another catch-up to reality for sales, even as rates tumble…
Source: Bloomberg
Finally, we note that the median new home priced jumped to $434.7k from $414.9k…
Source: Bloomberg
The median existing home price dropped to lowest since April while median new home price jumped to highest since August
Odd that these ‘actual’ new home sales are plunging as ‘soft survey’ data shows homebuilder sentiment rising, and housing starts.
It‘s Biden’s Fiscal Inferno! Insane open borders, insane green spending, wars in Ukraine, Gaza and growing restlessness around Taiwan. Inflation. And a demented 81-year old President in charge.
The deficit is $44 billion higher than it was at the end of November 2022, according to the latest data released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Congress passed a “laddered” continuing resolution in November with a final expiration date of February 2. Conservative House Republicans have been calling for a reduction in federal spending to reduce the budget deficit. Congress must pass another spending bill to keep the government funded past Feb. 2.
The specific cuts the House GOP is considering remains unclear at this time, but any reduction in spending is likely to hit roadblocks in the Democratic-led Senate. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has criticized previous GOP attempts to cut domestic spending levels.
In September, House Republicans were trying to cut annual spending by about $120 billion, which still would not balance the budget. Congressional Democratic leaders were critical of their approach at the time.
Senate congressional leaders are currently debating a foreign assistance package that would provide additional aid to Ukraine and Israel as well as humanitarian assistance for Palestinian refugees along with money for U.S. border security. Senate leaders said on Tuesday that both sides were closer to a deal, but a formal agreement hasn’t been reached yet.
“With regard to the border discussion, I think it’s pretty safe to say that we’ve made some significant progress, but we obviously aren’t there,” McConnell said at the Capitol during his weekly news conference on Tuesday.
On the House side, Republicans have argued that additional aid for Israel and Ukraine should be paid for or “offset” by equivalent spending reductions. Schumer has said that such foreign assistance does not need to be paid for since it is considered emergency spending.
Senators are still in Washington negotiating on the package but the House has left town for the holidays.
Scott Hodge, president emeritus and senior policy adviser at the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan tax policy 501(c)(3) nonprofit, said the U.S. Treasury reporting a 13% increase in the deficit compared to November 2022 shows the U.S. government continues to go down the wrong path when it comes to fiscal policy.
“It is being driven by federal spending, which is up by $152 billion, a 17% increase compared to the same month in 2022. The monthly deficit would have been worse if decent economic growth hadn’t boosted federal tax collections by $108 billion, or 19%,” Hodge told Just the News.
“The problem with the federal budget is basic math—the growth in spending continues to outpace the growth in tax collections. This is why our national debit is heading toward $34 trillion. It cannot go on forever without serious economic consequences,” he added.
Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, shared a similar perspective on the matter. “The longer we allow our debt to worsen, the less room we ultimately have to respond to the kinds of global emergencies we’re seeing in the world today,” she said.
“This leaves policymakers with a choice: make the hard choices today by paying for our priorities and putting the national debt on a sustainable trajectory, or saddle the next generation with an even worse situation,” she added.
The national debt in January of 2020 was $17.2 trillion, according to historical data from the Peterson Foundation. By contrast, the national debt is currently $33.9 trillion, according to the U.S. Treasury.
And don’t forget that $212.5 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities.
The Federal government added $7 trillion in debt since 2020 while it took 215 years to get to $7 trillion before Covid and Bidenomics.
In what can simply be called fiscal insanity, The Federal government is borrowing like there is no tomorrow (given that Biden is 81 years old, this isn’t far off) displacing businesses and households. Heaven help us if the Federal government has to borrow more money to fight a real war like World War II.
So, the massive Federal debt gorging isn’t helping the housing market.
Confounded Interest - Anthony B. Sanders 
You must be logged in to post a comment.