Well, the San Francisco 49ers are playing the Cleveland Browns today with the Browns missing injured RB Nick Chubb and QB Deshaun Watson, replacing them with QB Dorian Thompson-Robinson (aka, Do Not Resuscitate or DNR) and RB Jerome “Exploding Pinto” Ford. ESPN gives the Browns a 26% chance of winning. I am amazed it is that high!
But back to economic news!
Gold is soaring due to the instability in the Middle East (Iran/Hamas/Hezbollah attacks on Israel). Let’s see if Israel continues it assault on Gaza or not.
Janet Yellen, Biden’s Treasury apparatchik, was at the IMF/World Bank meetings in Marrakesh (yes, former students are expecting me to like Crosby, Stills and Nash “Marrakesh Express” but I detest CS&N). Instead, here is Them with Here Comes The Night which is more fitting about risks in the global economy.
The heavy debt burdens of advanced economies — from the United States to China and Italy — was a recurrent theme in the meetings, which came after financial markets in recent weeks pushed U.S. bond yields higher. Italian central bank governor Ignazio Visco said there was an impression markets were “reevaluating the term premium” as investors become more nervous about holding longer-term debt.
JPMorgan chair of global research Joyce Chang put it another way. “The bond vigilantes are back, and the Great Moderation is over,” she told a panel of the two-decade era of relative economic calm before the 2008/09 financial crisis.
The Federal Reserve still hasn’t shrunk their massive balance sheet and removed the Covid stimulus. Call it lack of Fed retreat.
And mortgage rates continue to rise, up 174% under Stumblin’ Joe Biden despite The Fed not really shrinking their balance sheet.
I may be the only person in the US cheering for House Republicans being at an impasse over House Speaker. Why? Congress can’t approve massive spending bills with out a Speaker! Less spending, less inflation! There fixed inflation without The Fed.
Paul Krugman, Nobel Laureate in economics and media celebrity, made a terrible claim yesterday when he pronounced that “The war on inflation is over. We won, at very little cost.” Krugman’s proclamation was trumpeted by The View’s Joy Behar Joy who claimed that everything is going great in the country! The economy is “booming” and people are having an “easier time” putting bread on the table. Huh? Easier than a month ago maybe, but not easier since 2021 under Bidenomics.
Hmm. Suppose that during World War II the Germans had stopped after they invaded and captured Paris on June 14, 1940. The war could have been over, but France was lost to Germany amidst thousands of dead and loss of property. That is not a victory, but a crushing defeat.
Just like my Paris example, Krugman’s claim the war on inflation is over and we won AT VERY LITTLE COST was grossly misleading and a big kerplunk (thud). Why? For one, the average American family is $7,400 POOR than in January 2021 when Biden became President. So, it looks like we know the cost of inflation and it was steep, not “very little cost.” Well, very little cost to elitist millionaires like Krugman.
Krugman loves the recent inflation report from the BLS. Specifically, the 12-month change in the Consumer Price Index Less Food And Energy for September was 4.1%. Krugman focuses on the recent 6-month change being less than 2%. In Krugman’s mind, this is victory … core inflation has been tamed and inflation is at The Fed’s target rate of 2%.
But before Krugman pops the champagne cap on the 1959 Dom Perignon for $42,350 (while the rest of us are drinking E&J Gallo’s Thunderbird), bear in mind that he is referring to the RATE OF GROWTH in prices, not the highly elevated levels of prices. Victory against inflation would be if prices returned to December 2020 levels.
I pointed out yesterday that “real” wages contracted 0.1% YoY (after 3 months positive) in September. It is important to note that real wage growth was negative from 2021 until 3 months ago, but has gone negative yet again. Victory??
Krugman prefers core inflation, removing food, housing and energy. You know, the three things most Americans actually care about. Take shelter (or rent of residence) where rent is growing at a sizzling 7.1% YoY.
Under Biden and Congress’ reckless spending splurges (and inane Federal energy policies), regular gasoline prices are up 64%. Growth in rent of residence has grown 252%! So, Professor Krugman, Americans are far worse off than before Biden was President.
If prices return to December 2020 (or pre-Covid levels), I will declare a victory. But for right now, symbollically, the German army is occupying France and Paris with horrible suffering for the French people. In other words, Americans are still far worse off under Biden even though inflation is finally slowing.ew
Speaking of France and World War II, maybe we should consider Joe Biden as today’s Pierre Laval, leader of Vichy France since Biden seems more concerned with pleasing Klaus Schwab and The World Economic Forum than America’s middle class and low wage worker (like Laval was concerned with that German leader Adolf Hitler thought).
Bidenomics is failing catestropically. Example? As interest rates rise to fight Biden’s Federal spending splurges, bank credit growth slowed to -0.41% YoY for the 10th straight week of negative credit growth.
While interest paid on short-term loans almost 10%!!
“Jimmy, watch me tank the economy even worse than you did!”
Former Fed Chair Janet Yellen, notorious for leaving rates too low for too long (TLTL) and then suddely raising them after Donald Trump was elected President, wants rates lower again for much longer. Make rates great again (MRGA?).
YELLEN SAYS DEBT SERVICE COSTS WILL BE 1% OF GDP FOR THE NEXT DECADE. – Reuters
Her statement implies that the economy will be strong and the government will run budget surpluses, or interest rates will be near zero for the next ten years.
Instead of guessing what she is pondering, we do some math and arrive at the only possible answer.
The Government Can’t Afford Today’s Interest Rates
Before walking through various scenarios to figure out what Yellen may be implying, it’s helpful to provide background on what drives her mindset. In our article The Government Can’t Afford Higher For Longer, Much Longer, we shared the following graph and commentary:
Total federal interest expenses should rise by approximately $226 billion over the next twelve months to over $1.15 trillion. For context, from the second quarter of 2010 to the end of 2021, when interest rates were near zero, the interest expense rose by $240 billion in aggregate. More stunningly, the interest expense has increased more in the last three years than in the fifty years prior.
The graph above is just the tip of the fiscal iceberg. Every month, lower-interest-rate debt matures and will be replaced with higher-cost debt.
Higher interest rates are an additional funding burden for the federal government. Janet Yellen surely understands the damaging situation and grasps that higher interest rates are not feasible given current debt levels.
Low-Interest Rates Make Debt Manageable
The government’s debt-to-GDP ratio has climbed three-fold since 1966. Yet, until very recently, the ratio of the federal interest expense to GDP was at its lowest level since 1966.
While the amount of debt rose sharply, its cost was offset by rapidly falling interest rates. As a result, higher debt levels were very manageable.
If $1 trillion of debt with a 4% coupon matures, and the Treasury replaces it with $2 trillion at a 2% coupon, the interest expense doesn’t change despite doubling the debt. While a simplified example, that is essentially what has occurred for the last 30 years.
The following graph compares the 5-year U.S. Treasury note and the implied cost of funding the government’s debt.
In time, as lower interest rate debt is replaced with higher interest rate debt, the benefits of lower rates work in reverse.
“Debt Service Costs At 1%” – Is It Possible?
We return to Janet Yellen’s message and discuss why she is likely correct.
Balanced Budgets and Unicorns
In the five years leading up to the pandemic, nominal GDP grew at 5.03% annually. Let’s optimistically assume growth continues at 5% consistently for the next ten years. Now, let’s tack on an even bolder presumption: the government balances its budget every year for the next ten years. Thus, the amount of outstanding debt will remain constant. For context, in the last 57 years, there has only been one year in which the amount of debt has not increased.
In such a far-fetched scenario, the debt-to-GDP ratio would drop considerably to 70%. However, interest costs would equal 2% of GDP. Such is much better than the current 3.36% but double Janet Yellen’s 1% objective.
Budget surpluses for the next ten years would lower interest expenses even more and possibly get the interest expense to GDP ratio to 1%. However, the odds of a unicorn spraying rainbows across the sky and the government running a surplus are the same: zero percent.
Consequently, we exclude surpluses as a viable way to reduce the interest expense to a more manageable level.
Budget Deficits And The Magic Of Low-Interest Rates
Balanced budgets or surpluses are unrealistic, given the political and fiscal trends. Further, the economy relies heavily on government spending. While fiscal prudence would be good in the long run, the short-run effect would be a recession.
Instead of using pipe dreams as scenarios, let’s get realistic. The more likely, albeit still optimistic, scenario involves the debt and GDP growing at the same rate. Let’s also assume interest rates remain at current levels. In this exercise, we assume an average borrowing cost of 4.75%, which is a little below the current weighted average funding cost for the government. Under this “realistic” picture, interest expense would climb to 5.6% of GDP.
The only logical variable in the equation that can make Janet Yellen correct is the future interest rate.
To arrive at Yellen’s 1% figure, assuming debt grows at the rate of GDP, interest rates must be much lower.
In time, a weighted average interest rate of 0.85% would put the nation’s interest expense at 1% of GDP.
When Janet Yellen tells us the debt cost to GDP ratio will be 1% over the next ten years, she is really saying interest rates will be below 1% for the next ten years.
Therefore, Janet Yellen must believe that the recent spike in inflation and yields is an anomaly. If the pre-pandemic economic and interest rate trends resume, she will be correct.
Summary
Part of Janet Yellen’s job is to exude confidence to its investors. In this case, it means telling the public that the current jump in interest expenses will not last. While she would probably prefer to be straightforward and say interest rates will be much lower, she must also be sympathetic to the Fed’s job of getting inflation down. Therefore, to walk the party line, she must speak in code, so to speak.
Whether you agree with Yellen’s projection or not, the following CBO graph projecting interest costs as a percentage of tax revenues, courtesy of Bianco Research, highlights that the government has no choice but lower for longer interest rates. The current level of interest rates will bankrupt the nation.
This makes sense. Two global elitists who look down with disdain and want to reprogram MAGA voters. Can we reprogram the MRGA types into letting rates float to market.
Joe Biden, who has always been a compulsive liar but at least sounded cognicent, is now babbling and whispering that Bidenomics works. But for who?
Clearly not for first time homebuyers or people looking to move. Bankrate’s 30-year mortgage rate is up to almost 8%, the highest since July 2000 and Willy Slick Clinton. That is a 176% increase in mortgage rates under the most inept “Economic Sheriff” in history.
Deficits? Deficits (which Biden makes outlandish claims) are usually only this big at times of HIGH unemployment and recessions. So, are the staggering deficits under Biden a precursor to a hard landing (recession)? Don’t listen to what Biden or KJP say!!!
Biden’s outlandish claims that he single handedly reduced the deficit by the most in history is, well, typical Biden bloviating. Actually, tax receipts soared after Covid lockdowns ended. Period. Now that stimulus is wearing out, deficits are climbing again.
As Biden sleeps through the Hamas invasion of Israel, that is nothing new. Biden is sleeping through a disastrous downturn in the economy and pretending that Bidenomics is working. It isn’t Joe!
The IBD/TIPP U.S. Economic Optimism Index sank to a 12-year low in October as confidence in the near-term economic outlook crashed to the lowest level in the poll’s history. The survey casts doubt on the Federal Reserve’s justification for turning more hawkish last month: robust consumer spending.
The overall IBD/TIPP U.S. Economic Optimism Index dived 6.9 points to 36.3, the lowest since August 2011. Readings below the neutral 50 level reflect pessimism. The 6-month economic outlook index cratered 9.6 points to 28.7, a record low since the IBD/TIPP Poll began in early 2001.
That means the outlook suddenly appears worse than it was at the depths of the dot-com crash, the great financial crisis and the coronavirus pandemic.
And on the personal savings front, net savings as a percentage of gross national income was negative for the second straight quarter.
Sleepy Joe, wake up! The US economy is slowing down REALLY fast!
US Treasury yields are a runaway train. The 30-year Treasury yield is soaring and rose above 5% … again. First time since 2007, just before the financial crisis and The Great Recession.
Coping with inflation caused by Federal spending (and excessive Fed stimulus) is difficult and eventually consumer max out their credit cards. Like now!
Credit card useage nosedived by -10.8% in September, according to Citi. This is the fifth straight month of spending decleration.
Leading the decline was electronics. The leader on the positive sign was … jewelry?? Hey, I thought mobs of people were robbing stores because they were hungry!!
In terms of bank credit, rising rates to fight inflation, bank credit growth Bank credit growth has been negative for nine straigth weeks.
Then we have unrealized losses on bank balance sheets, expected to surge to $700 billion with soaring interest rates.
On a different note, Homeland “Security” head Mayorkas now claims the US has to build a wall to combat the out-of-control immigration on the southern border. Wait! I thought Mayorkas and Congressional members (angrily) claim the border was secure! It doesn’t matter, Mayorkas is simply signalling to blue states that he will build a wall. But how fast is a different question.
Alarm! US 10-year Treasury yields are soaring along with mortgage rates.
The US Treasury market is witnessing another significant selloff, pushing the 10y UST yield close to the 4.50% mark. The surge in real rates is remarkable, reaching 2.12% for the 10y, a level not seen since 08’. While this might appear attractive in real terms compared to historical benchmarks, could we be on the brink of a third consecutive year of negative performance for US Treasuries? To put this into perspective, such a scenario has never occurred in history.
The conforming mortgage rate is at 7.3%, up 156% under since Biden’s coronation as El Presidente of the United Banana Republics of America. Where political opponents are indicted prior to elections.
In Biden’s Banana Republic economy, the US Treasury 10y-2y yield curve remains inverted.
And then we have Mish’s chart on debt as a percentage of GDP from CBO. Remember, we used to worry about the US breaking the 80% debt to GDP level. It is now projected to be 181%. Wow.
Its hard to watch Biden and The Progressive Greens destroy the enegy security of this great nation. Biden is draining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, probably in a misguided attempt at ensuring we never go back to abundent petroleum again. Crude oil inventories are now the lowest since 1985.
Household spending has kept the US economy afloat, but as growth slows a continued rise in oil and gas prices is poised to push personal consumption expenditure (PCE) lower and thus trigger a near-term recession – with stocks and bonds unpriced for such an outcome.
Once again it has been the redoubtable consumer that has thus far kept a recession at bay. However, Bloomberg Economics (BBE) pointed out in a recent article that negative household sentiment – in confluence with other drivers of household spending – suggests that we should already be in a recession.
A regression model (using income, wealth and real rates) pins PCE growth roughly where it is. But if we add in the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment index, it indicates much weaker PCE growth and thus an economy that would likely be already be in the midst of a slump.
I recreated BBE’s model and got something similar. I then substituted in the Conference Board’s Consumer Index instead of the Michigan survey. This also improves the fit of the original model, but does not paint as negative a picture for PCE. The reason is that the Conference Board’s measure has not deteriorated as much as the Michigan survey.
Why? The divergence between the two likely comes from the Michigan’s greater emphasis on frequent expenditures and business conditions, while the Conference Board’s index is more focused on the jobs market. As an employee, the jobs market has looked pretty good, boosting the Conference Board’s index, while the Michigan survey is more influenced by rising prices and conditions for small-business holders, which have been less rosy.
The Michigan survey is in fact very sensitive to gas prices. In the model, I added the average gas price to the model’s original inputs (i.e. ex Michigan). Doing so also improves the model’s fit, and as the chart below shows, implies notably weaker, and negative, PCE growth – and therefore an economy that would likely already be in a recession.
This highlights that the US economy is potentially on thin ice, with that ice represented by hitherto positive consumer sentiment, driven in no small part by gas prices (and sentiment on how high they are perceived to be) that remain comparatively cheap to the levels they reached last year.
But oil has been rising, driven by excess liquidity, falling inventories and supply cuts.
Tailwinds remain for oil, and therefore the nascent recent rise in gas prices is poised to continue as well. That could be the final straw which unseats the US consumer and tips the US into a recession.
The US warhawks seemed focused on Ukraine’s security, but don’t seem to care about US energy security or the personal welfare associated with open borders. Just ask Mayor Adams of New York City.
Confounded Interest - Anthony B. Sanders 
You must be logged in to post a comment.