On Tuesday, it was announced that Presidential candidate Kamala Harris would be supporting President Joe Biden’s tax proposals for 2025, which include a 44.6% capital gains rate and a 25% tax on unrealized gains.
Having used up all of the rest of the batshit, insane, counterintuitive economic dirty tricks left in the “we’ll literally do anything but cut spending” bag, the Biden administration began pushing this tax idea in April 2024 when I first wrote about it. Unrealized gains taxation could be the most destructive idea for our country since prohibition, I joked at the time.
As part of its budget proposal for the 2025 fiscal year, the Biden administration was trying to raise an addition $4.3 trillion over 10 years in the worst way possible: imposing a minimum tax equal to 25 percent of a taxpayer’s taxable income and unrealized capital gains less the sum of their regular tax, for taxpayers with wealth over $100 million.
Biden/Harris pushes taxes way beyond the revenue maximing point, down to the point of deminishing revenues and economic growth. Here is the Laffer Curve.
Putting aside the fact that this high-risk idea only amounts to a pittance, $430 billion per year, the introduction of taxing unrealized gains could be one of the worst slippery slopes we ever dare to roll our country’s economy down.
We could save $1 trillion just by not sending $100 billion a year to other nations for starters.
A tax on unrealized capital gains means that individuals are penalized for owning appreciating assets, regardless of whether they have realized any actual income from selling them.
If you purchased a stock for $100 this year, for example, and it increased to $110 next year, you would pay the assigned tax rate on the $10 capital gain. You didn’t sell the asset, so you don’t realize the $10 appreciation, but must pay the tax regardless.
Taxing unrealized capital gains contradicts the basic principles of fairness and property rights essential for a free and prosperous society. Taxation, if we’re going to have it on income, should be based on actual income earned, not on paper gains that may never materialize.
mplementing such a tax not only deeply infringes upon personal liberty and private property rights — but I can’t help but think about how it also sets a destructive wrecking ball rolling down a slippery slope for the first time in our nation’s history.
And, given the precarious state of our nation’s finances, it doesn’t seem like the best time to start spitballing about new risky ideas that may or may not catch on only because they sound like they are addressing the problem of a widening wealth gap that Federal Reserve policies created and continue to exacerbate to begin with.
If the administration really wanted to address the problem of wealth inequality, it would be setting its sights on the central bank that sacrificed price stability so it could spray trillions of dollars in “stimulus” toward financial assets, while cutting American families paltry checks of just $600, during COVID. When I did the math during COVID, the total amount spent to bail out the country.
Why do we trust any Democrat politiician? I certainly don’t!
Taxing unrealized gains would risk mass sale of US assets and therRich fleeing.
The US is already at $35+ trillion with unfunded liabilties totalling $218+ trillion. Of course, the Biden Administration is attempting to cut Medicare for seniors and raise the price while handing out unlimited benefits to illegal immigrants.
.Given the financial burden of war, the country suspended interest payments on international debt over the last two years, which was set to expire on August 1, 2024.
Without this new debt restructuring, this default would have ranked among the 10 largest in recent history. The last time Ukraine defaulted on its debt was in 2015, after Russia’s invasion of Crimea.
Below, we show the biggest sovereign debt defaults between 1983 and 2022:
Greece’s $264.2 billion default in 2012 stands as the largest overall, unfolding when the country was mired in recession for the fifth consecutive year.
The country defaulted again just nine months later, making it the fourth-largest ever. Leading up to the crash, Greece ran significant deficits despite being one of the fastest-growing countries in Europe. Furthermore, in 2009, the newly elected prime minister revealed that the country was $410 billion in debt—substantially more than previous estimates.
With the second-highest default recorded, Argentina failed to repay interest on $82.3 billion in foreign debt in 2001. Like Greece, it is a repeat offender, defaulting numerous times since independence in 1816. Today, Argentina is the largest debtor to the International Monetary Fund, despite being Latin America’s third-largest economy.
Following next in line is Russia’s 1998 default on $72.7 billion in loans, coinciding with a currency crisis that erased more than two-thirds of the ruble’s value in a matter of weeks. That year, several other countries including Venezuela, Pakistan, and Ukraine defaulted on their debts after the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997 spurred instability in global financial markets.
Just as 1998 saw a wave of defaults, 2020 was a year marked by major debt upheavals. Due to the pandemic and collapsing oil prices, it was a record year for sovereign defaults, reaching seven in total. Among these, Lebanon, Ecuador, and Argentina saw the largest defaults amid deepening fiscal pressures.
Harris is just another free-spending politician who will eventually lead the US into default. But at least Harris/Walz exude joy.
At least Harris/Walz haven’t adopted (stolen) the phrase “Work makes one free”.
Back in 2023, Socialist Paul Krugman declared that “the war on inflation is over!!! “We” won, at very little cost.” I love when elitists claim “We won!” since clearly 99% of Americans lost since food, housing and car prices up are double digits under Biden.
The problem is that food, energy, shelter, and used cars/trucks are a huge part of Americans consumption basket.
Under Biden, food CPI is up 23%. Home prices are up 34% and used cars/truck prices are up 17.7%.
A note to Paul Krugman, YOU may have won, but the rest of Americans lost. Consumer purchasing power of the US Dollar is DOWN 16.5% Under Biden.
We are living in the USA where corruption, favoritism, open borders and an out-of-control Federal budget and debt are destroying this once great nation.
Former Kansas City Fed President Thomas M. Hoenig was absolutely right when he said recently that The Federal Reserve panders to Wall Street, Congress and special interest groups, prioritizing immediate relief over financial stability. Bernanke’s zero-interest rate policies (ZIRP) and Quantitative Easing (QE) were short-term fixes that never went away. Indeed, since the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008-2009, US Dollar purchasing power is DOWN -32% and M2 Money is up a staggering 177%. While Yellen stuck with zero-interest policies until Trump was elected, then raised The Fed Funds Target Rate 8 times. Yellen only raised the target rate once under Obama. Clearly playing political favoritism.
The Federal Reserve’s lack of transparency comes amidst reports that countries are removing their gold and other assets from the U.S. in the wake of the unprecedented Western sanctions imposed on Russia over its invasion of Ukraine. According to a 2023 Invesco survey, a “substantial percentage” of central banks expressed concern about how the U.S. and its allies froze nearly half of Russia’s $650 billion gold and forex reserves.Headline USA filed a FOIA request with the Fed for records reflecting how much gold the Federal Reserve Bank of New York currently holds in its vault, as well as records reflecting the ownership stake that each of FRBNY’s central bank/government clients have in that gold. The FOIA request also sought records about the Fed’s gold holdings prior to Russia’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine. However, the Federal Reserve denied the FOIA request on Wednesday.
It influences the price of nearly everything, as well as the availability of jobs, the stability of our banking system, and the purchasing power of our money.
When the Fed Chair speaks, the entire world stops to listen.
But the average person has a poor understanding of how this colossally important entity operates. Or even why it exists.
And after a series of asset price bubbles — which some argue we’re in another one now — a chorus skeptical of the Fed’s actions has emerged.
So today we’re doing our best to shine as bright a light as possible on the Fed: how & why it operates, the good & as well as the shortcomings of its actions to date, what direction its policies are likely to take from here, and how all of this impacts the households of regular people like you and me.
Here are my top takeaways from from a speech by former KC Fed President Thomas Hoenig:
Dr Hoenig admits the Federal Reserve has experienced substantial “mission creep” since its creation as a lender of last resort. Its track record is very much “mixed” in terms of delivering on the intent of its policies. In Dr. Hoenig’s opinion, its efforts to add stability sometimes instead only create more instability.
While very critical of the Fed’s QE and ZIRP policies in the wake of the GFC, and more recently in the $trillions in monetary & fiscal stimulus unleashed post-COVID, Dr Hoenig thinks current Fed policy is “about right”. Though he expects the Fed to come under serious pressure soon as ebbing liquidity allows recessionary forces to build. He thinks the Fed will need to make an important decision within the coming year: return to QE and re-flame inflation, or allow a recession to occur.
Dr Hoenig criticizes the Federal Reserve for pandering to various interests, noting that short-term thinking and pressures from Wall Street, Congress, and interest groups often lead to decisions that prioritize immediate relief over long-term stability — a sort of “We’ll act now for optics sake and hopefully figure things out later”
In Dr Hoenig’s opinion, our fiscal policy is a runaway disaster. He criticizes both political parties of Congress for their roles in the cycle of ever-increasing deficits. Democrats advocate increased spending and tax hikes, while Republicans aim to keep taxes low but fail to curb spending. He warns of dire long-term consequences for future generations due to this impasse.
Dr Hoenig is very worried about the current stability of the banking system (and this from a former Direct of the FDIC!). He advocates for essential reforms to address government spending, prioritize essential areas without relying on future borrowed funds or inflationary measures, and communicate transparently with the public. He stresses the importance of reducing debt growth substantially below national income growth to avoid a full-blown crisis scenario in the future.
Dr Hoenig predicts the purchasing power of the US dollar (and other world fiat currencies) will continue to decline due to current policies and the lack of a “discipline” to money creation. Until such a discipline is restored (perhaps a return to some sort of hard backing of the currency), the dollar’s fall in purchasing power won’t abate.
Dr Hoenig suggests investing time in reading history and biographies as a valuable way to learn about leadership and gain insights into what strategies works and which don’t.
Here is the “Sound Money Parade” in 1896. By the aftermath of the subprime crisis, Janet Yellen (1993-2020) adopted the UNSOUND Money Fest, an orgy of printing and charging near zero interest rates. Powell in 2021 is ever-so-slowly unwinding The Fed’s balance sheet, but Powell has raised The Target Rate to its highest level since 1998 to fight inflation caused by Biden’s policies.
Combine The Fed not telling us how much gold they hold and their overprinting problems since 2008, and you can see why investors are turning to gold and silver and crypto currencies. The adoption of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a step towards financial collapse.
Here is a parade you will NEVER see in Washington DC. A Sound Money Parade!
Powell is beginning to act like a sound money fan, but he still is taking his sweet time shriking the balance sheet.
I am thinking of fleeing to Lilliehammer Normay like Frank Tagliano.
Like last month, today’s jobs report for March is better than Februrary’s miracle report, but has some glaring bad news that the Administration and slobbering media will ignore. Now you know why I no longer appear on CNBC, CNN or Fox Business anymore.
Let’s start with the good news! The BLS reported that in March, the US added a whopping 303K jobs, tied for the highest since Jan 2023!
Turning our attention to the unemployment rate, it unexpectedly dipped again, dropping to 3.8%, from 3.9%, in line with estimates, as the number of unemployed workers dipped modestly from 6.458 million to 6.429 million while the number of employed workers rose by almost half a million workers; the unemployment rate for Blacks (6.4 percent) increased in March to the highest level in almost two years, while the rates for Asians (2.5 percent) and Hispanics (4.5 percent) decreased. The jobless rates for adult men (3.3 percent), adult women (3.6 percent), teenagers (12.6 percent), and Whites (3.4 percent) showed little or no change over the month.
In contrast, the participation rate rose from 62.5% to 62.7%, above the 62.6% expected, as the overall civilian labor force increased slightly less than the number of employed people.
Now for the not-so-good news. The average hourly earnings came in as expected, rising 0.3% MoM, up from last month’s upward revised 0.2% sequential increase (revised from 0.1%), On an annual basis, the hourly earnings rose 4.1%, as expected, and down from 4.3%. This was the lowest print in almost three years: the last time wages rose by this much was the summer of 2021.
Now for the bad news.
For those wondering if the jobs were all part-time, the answer is a resounding yes: in March, full-time jobs dropped by 6,000 as Part-time jobs soared by 691,000.
On a year-over-year (YoY) basis, full-time jobs were down -1.0% while part-time jobs were up 7.1%
Native-born versus foreign born? On a YoY basis, native-born employment was down -0.5% while foreign-born employment increased by 4.2%.
Not only is Biden importing Democrat voters (since 70% of Americans HATE Biden’s policies), they are also displacing native-born Americans in the labor force.
Manufacturing jobs added were ZERO. So, much for all of Biden’s claims. But NON-PRODUCTIVE government jobs were up 71,000. So our manufacturing jobs are dead while non-productive government jobs are growing like crazy.
Under Biden, the Administrative state is growing faster than manufacturing since Feb 2023. The Biden Administration implements new rules to prevent Trump’s ability to purge deep state employees if re-elected in 2024.
How will The Fed respond? Likely will lead to limited rate cuts.
Bidenomics is really about insane money printing after Covid and the installation of Biden as President. Biden and The Federal Reserve are both pushin’ too hard. Biden to fundamentally change the US and The Fed trying to cope with the inflation reaction. With Covid and then Biden’s selection as President, Federal outlays exploded (blue line) and remain elevated under Biden. To help finance the (outrageous) spending The Federal Reserve massively increased the M2 Money supply (green line). Now, The Fed has withdrawn some of the excessive monetary stimulus, but there is a staggering amount monetary stimulus still swimming around the economy like a Great White Shark.
The problem with Federal policies (energy, government spending, government debt) is that there are unpredictable factors that undo the best laid plans of mice and men. And rats such as crop blights and changes in consumer habits.
A good example is the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which can be drained if craven politicians want to manage oil and gasoline prices for political purposes. Unfortunately, the promise of replenishment is made difficult by rising crude oil prices. The Biden admin cancels plan to refill emergency oil reserve amid high prices (some caused by factors such as war, often caused by government).
In fact, spot crude is up 73% under Biden. Partly, because of Biden’s promised war on fossil fuels and international disasters like war, blights, etc. This is why I cringe when I hear politicians and “economists” discuss why inflation will fall.
On the food side, we have cocoa prices rising 136% under Biden. Again, not predictable when policies were being made. Combine crop blights were rising transportation costs and DC, we have a problem! But this is one reason why The Fed, etc, focus on core inflation (excluding energy and food prices).
There are many examples of rising prices and how they hurt consumers, particularly middle-class and low wage workers.
How did The Federal Reserve react to the inflation Biden helped create? They raised The Fed Funds Target Rate (Upper Bound) by 2,100% to combat Bidenflation. Freddie Mac’s 30-year mortgage rate is up 156% helping to crush homeownership aspiration for younger households.
And then we have Congress/Biden shoveling more than $10 billion in subsidies to Intel, even though Intel has an incentive to develop chips using borrowed funds and Intel retained earnings. But why put your shareholders at risk in case the chip gamble doesn’t payoff. Just shift the risk to US taxpayers!
The Federal Reserve has created America’s version of India’s caste system. At the top of the neo American caste system are bankers and the political donor class. The top 1%. The other 99% are losing ground to the Brahmin Banker Class.
In 1913, Woodrow Wilson and his progressives promised that the Federal Reserve would avert both depressions and inflation, while preventing the wealthy from controlling America’s financial markets at the expense of the poor, the new untouchable class.
As you can see, the Brahmin Banker class (top .1% of net worth) are beating the socks off the bottom 50% of the new American caste system. This problems has greatly accelerated under Biden’s Reign of Error.
For two decades, the Fed kept interest rates artificially low to help finance massive government spending. When that spending reached unprecedented heights in 2020, the Fed intervened more drastically than ever, creating trillions of dollars and devaluing the currency.
Thus began an unparalleled transfer of wealth that continues to this day, and which has driven a wedge between different groups of Americans.
The painful inflation of the last three years has increased prices throughout the economy, distorting the signals that prices are supposed to convey to buyers and sellers. For example, the cost to own a median-price home today has doubled since January 2021, but it’s still the same house.
This phenomenon represents the monetization of housing, where a dwelling becomes a much better store of value than the currency, even if the real value of the house hasn’t improved.
Likewise, Americans’ earnings have increased substantially over the last three years, but not in the most meaningful sense—that is, what they can buy. Instead, the opposite has happened, and today’s larger incomes buy less.
What would have been a decent salary in 2019 is no longer enough to even get by in many places, and it’s certainly not enough to ever fulfill the American dream of homeownership.
A family earning the median household income can afford a median-price home in only a handful of major metropolitan areas in the entire country. In many cities, the cost to own a median price home exceeds the take-home pay from the median household income. Even if you didn’t spend a dime on other necessities such as food, you still wouldn’t have enough for your mortgage payment.
It’s truly a condemnation of the status quo when even those with seemingly high incomes cannot afford a typical house.
Worse, as prices continue marching upward, people can save less, making it harder to accrue a sufficient down payment. Even by the time a family reaches their goal, home prices have increased again, and they’re back on the hamster wheel, trying to save for an even larger down payment.
Meanwhile, inflation is steadily, though silently, taxing away the real value of the family’s savings as they sit in the bank.
This has left countless Americans as perpetual renters, with almost an entire generation of young people giving up on having the standard of living that their parents had. An artificial chasm has been constructed between those who already own capital, like housing, and the remaining Americans who can only borrow such assets, as they do by renting.
Similarly, many of those struggling to afford sharply increased rents are going deeply into debt to keep a roof over their head while those who locked in a mortgage with a fixed interest rate before both home prices and interest rates exploded have shielded themselves from one of the largest drivers behind the cost-of-living increases of the last three years.
Many homeowners could not afford to buy their same home today. The monthly mortgage payment on a median-price home has doubled since January 2021. Thus, even if two families have identical incomes, the one that bought a home three years ago has a nearly insurmountable advantage over the other family trying to do so today.
The Fed’s monetary manipulations have financed trillions of dollars in federal budget deficits, but they’ve also created a permanent American underclass, something antithetical to the Founders’ vision for the country.
Class mobility is at the heart of the American dream, and the Fed has turned it into a nightmare.
Here is a photo of Joe Biden with “Doctor” Jill on Easter Sunday flanked by Fed Chair Jerome Powell and Jared Bernstein (whom I once debated in Washington DC).
Update: KJP confessed that it was Obama who created the Trans Day of Awareness back in 2009 (although strangly not enacted until this part Easter Sunday).
Happy Easter! I mean Happy TRADITIONAL Easter, not a Biden weird trans celebration.
Biden and Congress (Schumer, Johnson, McConnell, etc) spend and borrow like its cottage cheese.
After hitting $1 trillion in late 2023, interest expense on US debt rose to a record $1.1 trillion in late March, and ii) while US debt is now rising at a pace of $1 trillion every 3 months, US interest expense is rising at a just as torrid $100 billion every 4 months (this interval will also shrink to three months very soon).
he Biggest Picture: $1.1tn in interest payments on US government debt past 12 months, doubled since COVID (Chart 2); trend in govt spending (up 9% YoY) & debt (up $1.0tn every 100 days)…big motivation for Fed to cut rates to constrain surge in interest costs (“ICC” or Interest Cost Control policy)… bear in bonds (if no recession), steeper yield curve, weaker US$, higher commodities/gold/crypto & TINA for stocks.
Of course, since Hartnett is one of those good strategists where one fact opens up a cascade of downstream observations, that’s precisely what happened this time and he fills out the balance of his latest report (available to pro subscribers in the usual place) with his tongue-in-cheek notes on why the US is on a doomsday date with a debtdisaster, starting with why being a “dove means never having to say you’re sorry”:
US government spending past 5 months = $2.7tn, up 9% YoY… on course for $6.7tn in FY24; US national debt rising $1tn every 100 days…set to hit $35tn in May’24, $37tn by US election, $40tn in H2’25 (doubling in 8 years); spending up, deficits up (9% of GDP average past 4 years), debt up -> interest payments up = $1.1tn in past 12 months & set to rise by $150bn in next 100 days[ZH: this sounds familiar]
US Treasury has aggressively shifted refunding toward <1-year T-Bills ($21tn issuance past 12 months), lowering maturity of debt to ≈5 years, increasing sensitivity to short rates, incentivizing Fed to cut rates;
And the punchline: Hartnett takes our observations, and expands them to their logical, if absurd, extreme (which ironically takes places in just 9 months) to find that US annual interest costs are set to jump from $1.1 trillion to $1.6 trillion, which is a big deal…
Unchanged rates/yields & debt trend next 12 months & US refinancing rate is 4.4% & annual interest costs jump from $1.1tn to $1.6tn (Chart 5); in contrast 150bps of Fed cuts next 12 months and average refi rate is 3.2%, stabilizing/constraining interest payments to $1.2-1.3tn over next 2 years; call it “ICC”/Interest Cost Control but Fed must placate fiscal excess coming quarters…bear in bonds (if no recession), steeper yield curve, weaker US$, higher commodities/gold/crypto & TINA for stocks.
… because if the Fed does not cut rate by 150bps (as it may in an “ICC” scenario) should inflation prove to be sticky (something which Putin clearly has figured out realizing the fate of Biden’s re-election is in his oily hands), and total interest does rise to $1.6 trillion by year-end, that it will become the single biggest US government outlay by the end of the fiscal year; as a reminder, in fiscal 2023, Social Security spending was $1.354 trillion, Health was $889 billion, Medicare $848 and national defense, a paltry (by comparison) $821 billion.
Stepping briefly away from the looming US debt disaster, Hartnett makes three more observations on the current state of the market:
Tech regulation getting noisier: DoJ vs Apple antitrust lawsuit, FTC vs Amazon antitrust lawsuit, FTC inquiry into AI deals of Amazon, Google, Microsoft; EU investigation into Apple, Meta, Google breach of Digital Markets Act; EU $2bn Apple antitrust fine, Japan FTC Apple & Google antitrust complaint et al…
“Magnificent 7” = 30% of SPX index & 60% of SPX gains past 12 months…investors love big tech “moats”, monopolistic ability to protect margins, market share, pricing power, finance & control AI arms race; but ≈$2tn of Magnificent 7 revenues past 12 months tempting target for regulators/governments struggling to pay bills;
Note tech historically the least regulated of sectors (the chart below uses data from 2017) and in past 12 months average tax rate of “Magnificent 7” was 15% vs 21% for rest of S&P 500… and regulation & rates the historic way sector bulls & bubbles end.
Now for the REALLY bad news. Unfunded liabilities (entitlements) have hit $214+ TRILLION. Given how voters hate paying more in taxes, look for the growing entitlements to add AT LEAST $214 trillion in NEW DEBT which will result in record high interest payments.
Hey big spender! How about NOT spending trilliions while pocketing 10% from foreign enemies?
Congress and The Biden Regime should select the now defunct British beer Watney’s Red Barrell (a truly awful beer) to symbolize their committment (or lack thereof) to fiscal responsibilty.
… in the process, sparking the biggest market meltup in a decade, we explained that there was no mystery behind the Fed’s sudden change of heart: it had everything to do with Biden’s woeful performance in the polls.
… maybe what that happened in the past two weeks had nothing to do with economic data, the state of the US consumer, or how hot inflation is running and everything to do with… phone calls from the increasingly angry White House, the same White House which after seeing the latest polling data putting Biden at the biggest disadvantage behind Trump despite the miracle of “Bidenomics” decided to pull its last political level, and had a back room conversation with the Fed Chair, making it very clear that it is in everyone’s best interest if the Fed ends its tightening campaign and informs the market that rate cuts are coming. It certainly would explain why despite keeping the 2026 projected fed funds rate unchanged at 2.875%, the Fed just as unexpectedly decided to pull one full rate cut out of the non-election year 2025 and push it into the pre-election 2024.
I don’t know why @federalreserve is in such a hurry to be talking about moving towards the accelerator. We’ve got unemployment, if anything, below what they think is full capacity. We’ve got inflation, even in their forecast, for the next two years above target. We’ve got GDP growth rising if anything faster than potential. We have financial conditions, the holistic measure of monetary policy, at a very loose level.
… to which we again replied that there is a very simple reason why the Fed is “moving toward the accelerator” and it again had to do with the fact that Biden approval rating is now imploding, so much so that even Time magazine has stepped in with an intervention.
But while once upon a time such a cynical, hyperbolic, and apocryphal view would have been relegated to the deep, dark corners of the financial blogosphere (duly shadowbanned and deboosted by the likes of such Democratic party stalwarts as Google, of course), that is no longer the case and in his latest note, SocGen’s in-house permaskeptic, Albert Edwards confirmed our view that the biggest driver behind the Fed’s decision making in recent months is neither the economy, nor the market, but rather the November presidential election, to wit:
The widening inequality chasm in this US election year will be a real issue for policy makers. What will the Fed do? Traditionally, the Fed would not pivot rates policy to cushion inequality, which is usually addressed by fiscal policy. But growing inequality has been a key issue ever since the 2008 Global Financial Crisis triggered a backlash against ‘The Establishment’ – most evident in the rise in popularism (although many, including myself, believe that the loose money/tight fiscal policy mix was primarily responsible).
Might the unfolding inequality crisis force the Fed to bow to intense political pressure to cut rates faster and deeper? I think that is entirely plausible. Indeed we on these pages have previously observed, somewhat cynically, that Powell’s recent ‘surprise’ December 2023 dovish pivot came exactly at a time when Donald Trump was pulling ahead in the polls – link. But it would be a diehard cynic who could contemplate that the Fed, as part of ‘The Establishment’, would balk at the thought of Trump winning in November and juice up the economy to try and lower the odds of such an outcome. (I am that cynic.)
To be fair, we find it remarkable that Edwards – a long-tenured and respected veteran of the SocGen macro commentariat – would confirm our own observations. We doubt he is the only one, of course, but the others are far more afraid of losing their jobs, at least for now.
What we find less remarkable is that Edwards – whose job is to track down gruesome and painful ways for the market to die a miserable death – has done just that again and this time, in the aftermath of the BOJ’s long overdue exit from NIRP, ETF buying and Yield Curve Control, predicts that it is now only a matter of time before the YCC that was spawned in Japan will soon shift to the west.
Edwards starts off by observing what has long been a “foolproof” signal of imminent recession: BOJ tightenging:
Market sentiment is now especially vulnerable to weak economic data because, as we pointed out last week, it seems everyone (and their dog) has left their recessionary worries far behind. But as my favorite bear, David Rosenberg, pointed out this week, recent weak retail sales, housing starts, and industrial production data might be setting us up for a negative US Q1 GDP print. Let’s see how the Fed reacts to that. And if you want one reliable predictor of a global recession, @PeterBerezinBCA notes that “In the history of modern finance, no single indicator has done a better job of predicting when the next global recession will start than when the Bank of Japan starts raising rates. Foolproof!”
He then recaps last week’s main event, namely that after almost a decade, Japan finally exited negative interest rates and Yield Curve Control (YYC), primarily on the back of soaring (nominal, not real) wage gains: “Rengo, Japan’s largest trade union confederation, announced last Friday that its members have so far secured pay deals averaging 5.28%, far outpacing the 3.8% squeezed out a year ago — itself the highest gain in 30 years (see Bloomberg here and SG Economist Jin Kenzaki’s analysis of this data and the BoJ’s move here).“
Of course, the problem in Japan is not that nominal wages are surging: it is that in real terms they are crashing, as the next chart clearly shows, and is why the BOJ will have to dramatically tighten – certainly much, much more than the laughable “dovish hike” it delivered last week which sent the yen plunging to a multi-decade low and inviting even more imported inflation – to avoid total collapse in Japan’s economy as it gradually accelerates toward hyperinflation:
Of course, Japan can not actually tighten as that would instantly vaporize the economy and the bond market of a country whose central bank owns Japanese JGBs accounting for well more than 100% of GDP. But at least Japan has something goign for it: as Edwards notes, “the OCED estimates that interest on US debt amounts to 4½% of GDP, compared to only 0.1% of GDP for Japan (link). Hence the cyclically adjusted primary (ex-interest) deficit data show Japan as the most profligate borrower (see right hand chart). But the US still has to pay that interest somehow.” In other words, when adding interest payment, “it is the US that has been running the largest deficits since the 2008 GFC – bigger than even Japan (see left hand chart).”
Which brings us to Edwards’ punchline: “decades of excessively loose monetary policy has allowed governments to ruin their fiscal situations to the point that public debt to GDP ratios are on wholly unsustainable trajectories. Just look at the CBO’s projections for the US here. Yet with an ever-intensifying populist backlash against high levels of inequality, I can only see one way out of this mess for western economies. Nothing less than Financial Repression including Yield Curve Control – yes, the very same YCC that Japan has just abandoned.”
For those who may not have been around back in the 1940s when the US – and the Federal Reserve – was the first developed nation to utilize YCC to kickstart the US economy at a time of record debt to GDP, here is a quick primer from the SocGen strategist: “Financial Repression essentially entails holding interest rates below the rate of inflation for a lengthy period to allow debt to be ‘burned off’. This is a tried and trusted way for governments to wriggle free from excessive debt (eg the US after WW2). The leading economic historian Russell Napier explained how this works in an informative 2021 interview with The Market NZZ – link.”
And indeed, it was only a few years ago, just before the pandemic sparked a stimulus flood of epic proportions, that western policy makers were switching to average inflation targeting and stating that they would run economies hot to create that higher inflation (they got it but not because of AIT). That was the first notable attempt to shift toward Financial Repression, but as Edwards notes, “unfortunately they were too successful and let the rampant inflation cat out of the bag.”
Which brings up the $64 trillion question: “Do the Fed and ECB really want inflation to return to pre-pandemic inflation lows?” Well, with global debt now about 7x higher in just the 21st century, and fast approaching $100 trillion, meaning it will all have to be inflated away somehow…
… Edwards’ answer is: “Not in my view.” And so while western economists deride Japan for its YCC policies, Albert says “that is where I think the US and Europe are heading as intractable government deficits drive up bond yields. During the next crisis, don’t be surprised to see yet more Japanification of western central bank policy. Plus ça change.” And don’t be surprised if the dollar – while appreciating against the rest of the world’s doomed currencies in the closed fiat-system loop – hyperdevalues against such finite concepts which mercifully remain out of the fiat system, such as gold and crypto.
Biden loves to blame Republicans for the border crisis. Although he has it in his power to close and secure the border, but won’t. It’s easier to blame the opposition, like “extreme MAGA Republicans.” Huh, I didn’t realize that as a conservative American I am considered extreme by the Biden Administration.
Unfortunately, Biden, Schumer and Johnson only provided financial support for Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Tunisia and Oman. In the form of $380 million.
As the US falls to 23rd in World Happiness ranking. Based, in part, on Biden’s idiotic open borders policy.
Confounded Interest - Anthony B. Sanders 
You must be logged in to post a comment.